Development and Pilot Test of the Workplace Readiness Questionnaire, a Theory-Based Instrument to Measure Small Workplaces' Readiness to Implement Wellness Programs

被引:28
作者
Hannon, Peggy A. [1 ]
Helfrich, Christian D. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Chan, K. Gary [4 ]
Allen, Claire L. [1 ]
Hammerback, Kristen [1 ]
Kohn, Marlana J. [1 ]
Parrish, Amanda T. [1 ]
Weiner, Bryan J. [5 ]
Harris, Jeffrey R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Hlth Promot Res Ctr, CDC Prevent Res Ctr, Sch Publ Hlth,Dept Hlth Serv, Seattle, WA 98105 USA
[2] Northwest Hlth Serv Res, Seattle, WA USA
[3] Dev Ctr Excellence, VA Puget Sound Hlth Care Syst, Seattle, WA USA
[4] Univ Washington, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Serv, Seattle, WA USA
[5] Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, UNC Gillings Global Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Chapel Hill, NC USA
关键词
Readiness for Change; Measure Development; Workplace Health Promotion; Prevention Research; HEALTH-SERVICES RESEARCH; ORGANIZATIONAL READINESS; LOW-WAGE; MODEL; COMMITMENT; EMPLOYERS;
D O I
10.4278/ajhp.141204-QUAN-604
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Purpose. To develop a theory-based questionnaire to assess readiness for change in small workplaces adopting wellness programs. Design. In developing our scale, we first tested items via "think-aloud" interviews. We tested the revised items in a cross-sectional quantitative telephone survey. Setting. The study setting comprised small workplaces (20-250 employees) in low-wage industries. Subjects. Decision-makers representing small workplaces in King County, Washington (think-aloud interviews, n = 9), and the United States (telephone survey, n = 201) served as study subjects. Measures. We generated items for each construct in Weiner's theory of organizational readiness for change. We also measured workplace characteristics and current implementation of workplace wellness programs. Analysis. We assessed reliability by coefficient alpha for each of the readiness questionnaire subscales. We tested the association of all subscales with employers' current implementation of wellness policies, programs, and communications, and conducted a path analysis to test the associations in the theory of organizational readiness to change. Results. Each of the readiness subscales exhibited acceptable internal reliability (coefficient alpha range, .75-.88) and was positively associated with wellness program implementation (p < .05). The path analysis was consistent with the theory of organizational readiness to change, except change efficacy did not predict change-related effort. Conclusion. We developed a new questionnaire to assess small workplaces' readiness to adopt and implement evidence-based wellness programs. Our findings also provide empirical validation of Weiner's theory of readiness for change.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 75
页数:9
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], RES ORG CHANGE DEV
  • [2] [Anonymous], AM J PUBLIC HLTH
  • [3] [Anonymous], LATENT VARIABLE MODE
  • [4] [Anonymous], ANN M AM STAT ASS
  • [5] [Anonymous], PREV CHRONIC DIS
  • [6] Workplace Wellness Programs Can Generate Savings
    Baicker, Katherine
    Cutler, David
    Song, Zirui
    [J]. HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2010, 29 (02)
  • [7] Research synthesis: The practice of cognitive interviewing
    Beatty, Paul C.
    Willis, Gordon B.
    [J]. PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 2007, 71 (02) : 287 - 311
  • [8] Employer coverage of clinical preventive services in the United States
    Bondi, MA
    Harris, JR
    Atkins, D
    French, ME
    Umland, B
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH PROMOTION, 2006, 20 (03) : 214 - 222
  • [9] Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science
    Damschroder, Laura J.
    Aron, David C.
    Keith, Rosalind E.
    Kirsh, Susan R.
    Alexander, Jeffery A.
    Lowery, Julie C.
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2009, 4
  • [10] Systems Antecedents for Dissemination and Implementation: A Review and Analysis of Measures
    Emmons, Karen M.
    Weiner, Bryan
    Fernandez, Maria Eulalia
    Tu, Shin-Ping
    [J]. HEALTH EDUCATION & BEHAVIOR, 2012, 39 (01) : 87 - 105