An empirical method for deriving RBE values associated with electrons, photons and radionuclides

被引:16
作者
Bellamy, M. [1 ]
Puskin, J. [2 ]
Hertel, N. [1 ]
Eckerman, K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Oak Ridge Natl Lab, Ctr Radiat Protect Knowledge, POB 2008, Oak Ridge, TN 37831 USA
[2] EPA, Ctr Sci & Technol, Radiat Protect Div, ORIA 6608J, Washington, DC 20460 USA
关键词
TRACK STRUCTURE-ANALYSIS; LOW-ENERGY ELECTRONS; MAMMOGRAPHY X-RAYS; GAMMA-RAYS; NEOPLASTIC TRANSFORMATION; BIOLOGICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CHROMOSOME-ABERRATIONS; HUMAN-LYMPHOCYTES; LIQUID WATER; RADIATION;
D O I
10.1093/rpd/ncu358
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
There is substantial evidence to justify using relative biological effectiveness (RBE) values of > 1 for low-energy electrons and photons. But, in the field of radiation protection, radiation associated with low linear energy transfer has been assigned a radiation weighting factor w(R) of 1. This value may be suitable for radiation protection but, for risk considerations, it is important to evaluate the potential elevated biological effectiveness of radiation to improve the quality of risk estimates. RBE values between 2 and 3 for tritium are implied by several experimental measurements. Additionally, elevated RBE values have been found for other similar low-energy radiation sources. In this work, RBE values are derived for electrons based upon the fractional deposition of absorbed dose of energies less than a few kiloelectron volts. Using this empirical method, RBE values were also derived for monoenergetic photons and 1070 radionuclides from ICRP Publication 107 for which photons and electrons are the primary emissions.
引用
收藏
页码:664 / 670
页数:7
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], Ann. ICRP
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1999, 402R99001 EPA
[3]  
[Anonymous], ANN ICRP
[4]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured], DOI DOI 10.1667/RR1099.1
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2011, EPA Radiogenic Cancer Risk Models and Projections for the U. S. Population
[6]   Routine screening mammography: how important is the radiation-risk side of the benefit-risk equation? [J].
Brenner, DJ ;
Sawant, SG ;
Hande, MP ;
Miller, RC ;
Elliston, CD ;
Fu, Z ;
Randers-Pehrson, G ;
Marino, SA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION BIOLOGY, 2002, 78 (12) :1065-1067
[7]   SOME PHYSICAL ASPECTS OF RELATIVE BIOLOGICAL EFFICIENCY [J].
BURCH, PRJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1957, 30 (358) :524-529
[8]   CALCULATIONS OF ENERGY DISSIPATION CHARACTERISTICS IN WATER FOR VARIOUS RADIATIONS [J].
BURCH, PRJ .
RADIATION RESEARCH, 1957, 6 (03) :289-301
[9]  
Cho S., 2007, RADIAT ENVIRON BIOPH, V47, P77
[10]   Relative biological effectiveness of mammography X-rays at the level of DNA and chromosomes in lymphocytes [J].
Depuydt, Julie ;
Baert, Annelot ;
Vandersickel, Veerle ;
Thierens, Hubert ;
Vral, Anne .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION BIOLOGY, 2013, 89 (07) :532-538