Association of an Opioid Standard of Practice Intervention With Intravenous Opioid Exposure in Hospitalized Patients

被引:11
作者
Ackerman, Adam L. [1 ,2 ]
O'Connor, Patrick G. [1 ]
Doyle, Deirdre L. [3 ]
Marranca, Sheyla M. [2 ]
Haight, Carolyn L. [3 ]
Day, Christine E. [3 ]
Fogerty, Robert L. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Sect Gen Internal Med, 20 York St,CB 2041, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
[2] Yale New Haven Med Ctr, Dept Med, Hospitalist Serv, New Haven, CT 06504 USA
[3] Yale New Haven Med Ctr, Dept Med, New Haven, CT 06504 USA
关键词
CANCER PAIN; SUBCUTANEOUS MORPHINE; PHARMACOKINETICS; ANALGESIA; INFUSION;
D O I
10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.1044
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
IMPORTANCE Opioids are commonly used to treat pain in hospitalized patients; however, intravenous administration carries an increased risk of adverse effects compared with oral administration. The subcutaneous route is an effective method of opioid delivery with favorable pharmacokinetics. OBJECTIVE To assess an intervention to reduce intravenous opioid use, total parenteral opioid exposure, and the rate of patients administered parenteral opioids. DESIGN, SETTING. AND PARTICIPANTS A pilot study was conducted in an adult general medical unit in an urban academic medical center. Attending physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants who prescribed drugs were the participants. Use of opioids was compared between a 6-month control period and 3 months following education for the prescribers on opioid routes of administration. INTERVENTIONS Adoption of a local opioid standard of practice, preferring the oral and subcutaneous routes over intravenous administration, and education for prescribers and nursing staff on awareness of the subcutaneous route was implemented. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was a reduction in intravenous doses administered per patient-day. Secondary measures included total parenteral and overall opioid doses per patient-day, parenteral and overall opioid exposure per patient-day, and daily rate of patients receiving parenteral opioids. Pain scores were measured on a standard 0- to 10-point Likert scale over the first 5 days of hospitalization. RESULTS The control period included 4500 patient-days, and the intervention period included 2459 patient-days. Of 127 patients in the intervention group, 59 (46.5%) were men; mean (SD) age was 57.6 (18.5) years. Intravenous opioid doses were reduced by 84% (0.06 vs 0.39 doses per patient-day, P<.001), and doses of all parenteral opioids were reduced by 55% (018 vs 0.39 doses per patient-day, P<.001). In addition, mean (SD) daily parenteral opioid exposure decreased by 49% (2.88 [0.72] vs 5.67 [114] morphine-milligram equivalents [MMEs] per patient-day). The daily rate of patients administered any parenteral opioid decreased by 57% (6% vs 14%; P<.001). Doses of opioids given by oral or parenteral route were reduced by 23% (0.73 vs 0.95 doses per patient-day, P=.02), and mean daily overall opioid exposure decreased by 31% (6.30 [4]2] vs 9.11[7.34] MMEs per patient-day). For hospital days 1 through 3, there were no significant postintervention vs preintervention differences in mean reported pain score for patients receiving opioid therapy: day 1, -0.19 (95%CI, -0.94 to 0.56); day 2, -0.49 (95%CI, -1.01 to 0.03); and day 3, -0.54 (95% CI,-1.18 to 0.09). However, significant improvement was seen in the intervention group on days 4 (-1.07; 95% CI, -1.80 to -0.34) and 5 (-1.06; 95% CI, -1.84 to -0.27). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE An intervention targeting the use of intravenous opioids may be associated with reduced opioid exposure while providing effective pain control to hospitalized adults.
引用
收藏
页码:759 / 763
页数:5
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   How fast and how often: The pharmacokinetics of drug use are decisive in addiction [J].
Allain, Florence ;
Minogianis, Ellie-Anna ;
Roberts, David C. S. ;
Samaha, Anne-Noel .
NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 2015, 56 :166-179
[2]   Randomized trial comparing 3 methods of postoperative analgesia in gynecology patients: patient-controlled intravenous, scheduled intravenous, and scheduled subcutaneous [J].
Bell, Jeffrey G. ;
Shaffer, Lynn E. T. ;
Schrickel-Feller, Trista .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 197 (05) :472.e1-472.e7
[3]  
BRUERA E, 1988, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V62, P407, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19880715)62:2<407::AID-CNCR2820620227>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-T
[5]   New Persistent Opioid Use After Minor and Major Surgical Procedures in US Adults [J].
Brummett, Chad M. ;
Waljee, Jennifer F. ;
Goesling, Jenna ;
Moser, Stephanie ;
Lin, Paul ;
Englesbe, Michael J. ;
Bohnert, Amy S. B. ;
Kheterpal, Sachin ;
Nallamothu, Brahmajee K. .
JAMA SURGERY, 2017, 152 (06)
[6]   SUBCUTANEOUS MORPHINE IN CHILDREN - TAKING THE STING OUT OF POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA [J].
LAVIES, NG ;
WANDLESS, JG .
ANAESTHESIA, 1989, 44 (12) :1000-1001
[7]  
McPherson ML., 2010, DEMYSTIFYING OPIOID, V1st, DOI DOI 10.37573/9781585284306
[8]   COMPARISON OF CONTINUOUS SUBCUTANEOUS AND INTRAVENOUS HYDROMORPHONE INFUSIONS FOR MANAGEMENT OF CANCER PAIN [J].
MOULIN, DE ;
KREEFT, JH ;
MURRAYPARSONS, N ;
BOUQUILLON, AI .
LANCET, 1991, 337 (8739) :465-468
[9]   Nurse-administered subcutaneous morphine is a satisfactory alternative to intravenous patient-controlled analgesia morphine after cardiac surgery [J].
Munro, AJ ;
Long, GT ;
Sleigh, JW .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1998, 87 (01) :11-15
[10]   Systematic review of the role of alternative application routes for opioid treatment for moderate to severe cancer pain: An EPCRC opioid guidelines project [J].
Radbruch, Lukas ;
Trottenberg, Peter ;
Elsner, Frank ;
Kaasa, Stein ;
Caraceni, Augusto .
PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2011, 25 (05) :578-596