Relating costs to the user value of farmland biodiversity measurements

被引:7
作者
Targetti, S. [1 ,2 ]
Herzog, F. [3 ]
Geijzendorffer, I. R. [4 ]
Pointereau, P. [5 ]
Viaggi, D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Aix Marseille Univ, Inst Adv Studies, F-13004 Marseille, France
[2] Univ Bologna, Dept Agr Sci, I-40127 Bologna, Italy
[3] Inst Sustainabil Sci, Agroscope, CH-8046 Zurich, Switzerland
[4] Avignon Univ, Inst Mediterraneen Biodiversite & Ecol Marine & C, CNRS, IRD,Aix Marseille Univ, F-13545 Aix En Provence 04, France
[5] SOLAGRO, Initiat & Innovat Energy Agr & Environm, F-31076 Toulouse, France
关键词
Agriculture; Farmer; Volunteer; Citizen science; Biodiversity indicators; Multi-criteria evaluation; Stakeholders; CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; CITIZEN SCIENCE; STAKEHOLDER PARTICIPATION; POLICY; CONSERVATION; INDICATORS; MANAGEMENT; LANDSCAPE; CHALLENGES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.08.044
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The impact of agricultural management on global biodiversity highlights the need for farm-scale monitoring programmes capable of determining the performance of agriculture practices. Yet the identification of appropriate indicators is a challenging process and one that involves considering a number of different aspects and requirements. Besides the attention given to scientific effectiveness, relevant but less studied issues related to biodiversity measurements include the economic feasibility of monitoring programmes and the relevance of indicators for different end-users. In this paper, we combine an analytic assessment of costs and a stakeholder-based evaluation of the usefulness of a set of biodiversity-related parameters (habitat mapping, vegetation, bees, earthworms, spiders, and a farmer questionnaire) tested for scientific consistency in 12 European case studies and on more than 14,000 ha of farmland. The results point to the possibility of meeting the expectations of different end-users (administrators, farmers and consumers) with a common indicator set. Combining costs and usefulness also suggests the possibility of designing more efficient monitoring approaches involving private agencies and networks of volunteers and farmers for the field data collection at different stages of a monitoring programme. Although complex, such an approach would make it possible to enhance the effectiveness of available funds for farmland biodiversity monitoring. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:286 / 297
页数:12
相关论文
共 91 条
  • [71] A method to assess ecosystem services developed from soil attributes with stakeholders and data of four arable farms
    Rutgers, M.
    van Wijnen, H. J.
    Schouten, A. J.
    Mulder, C.
    Kuiten, A. M. P.
    Brussaard, L.
    Breure, A. M.
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 415 : 39 - 48
  • [72] Saaty T.L., 2005, THEORY APPL ANALYTIC
  • [73] Bird-monitoring in Europe - a first overview of practices, motivations and aims
    Schmeller, Dirk S.
    Henle, Klaus
    Loyau, Adeline
    Besnard, Aurelien
    Henry, Pierre-Yves
    [J]. NATURE CONSERVATION-BULGARIA, 2012, (02): : 41 - 57
  • [74] The ecosystem service cascade: Further developing the metaphor. Integrating societal processes to accommodate social processes and planning, and the case of bioenergy
    Spangenberg, Joachim H.
    von Haaren, Christina
    Settele, Josef
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2014, 104 : 22 - 32
  • [75] "Effectively organic": Environmental gains on conventional farms through the market?
    Sutherland, Lee-Ann
    [J]. LAND USE POLICY, 2011, 28 (04) : 815 - 824
  • [76] Biodiversity and ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes - are we asking the right questions?
    Swift, MJ
    Izac, AMN
    van Noordwijk, M
    [J]. AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2004, 104 (01) : 113 - 134
  • [77] Estimating the cost of different strategies for measuring farmland biodiversity: Evidence from a Europe-wide field evaluation
    Targetti, S.
    Herzog, F.
    Geijzendorffer, I. R.
    Wolfrum, S.
    Arndorfer, M.
    Balazs, K.
    Choisis, J. P.
    Dennis, P.
    Eiter, S.
    Fjellstad, W.
    Friedel, J. K.
    Jeanneret, P.
    Jongman, R. H. G.
    Kainz, M.
    Luescher, G.
    Moreno, G.
    Zanetti, T.
    Sarthou, J. P.
    Stoyanova, S.
    Wiley, D.
    Paoletti, M. G.
    Viaggi, D.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2014, 45 : 434 - 443
  • [78] Targetti S., 2012, Food Economics, V9, P2
  • [79] Global change and local solutions: Tapping the unrealized potential of citizen science for biodiversity research
    Theobald, E. J.
    Ettinger, A. K.
    Burgess, H. K.
    DeBey, L. B.
    Schmidt, N. R.
    Froehlich, H. E.
    Wagner, C.
    HilleRisLambers, J.
    Tewksbury, J.
    Harsch, M. A.
    Parrish, J. K.
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2015, 181 : 236 - 244
  • [80] Forecasting agriculturally driven global environmental change
    Tilman, D
    Fargione, J
    Wolff, B
    D'Antonio, C
    Dobson, A
    Howarth, R
    Schindler, D
    Schlesinger, WH
    Simberloff, D
    Swackhamer, D
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2001, 292 (5515) : 281 - 284