Talker information influences spectral contrast effects in speech categorization

被引:26
作者
Assgari, Ashley A. [1 ]
Stilp, Christian E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Louisville, Dept Psychol & Brain Sci, Louisville, KY 40292 USA
关键词
PERCEPTUAL COMPENSATION; VARIABILITY; IDENTIFICATION; LISTENER; CONTEXT; SOUNDS;
D O I
10.1121/1.4934559
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Spectral contrast effects, the perceptual magnification of spectral differences between sounds, have been widely shown to influence speech categorization. However, whether talker information alters spectral contrast effects was recently debated [Laing, Liu, Lotto, and Holt, Front. Psychol. 3, 1-9 (2012)]. Here, contributions of reliable spectral properties, between-talker and within-talker variability to spectral contrast effects in vowel categorization were investigated. Listeners heard sentences in three conditions (One Talker/One Sentence, One Talker/200 Sentences, 200 Talkers/200 Sentences) followed by a target vowel (varying from /I/-/epsilon/in F-1, spoken by a single talker). Low-F-1 or high-F-1 frequency regions in the sentences were amplified to encourage /epsilon/ or /I/ responses, respectively. When sentences contained large reliable spectral peaks (+20dB; experiment 1), all contrast effect magnitudes were comparable. Talker information did not alter contrast effects following large spectral peaks, which were likely attributed to an external source (e.g., communication channel) rather than talkers. When sentences contained modest reliable spectral peaks (+5 dB; experiment 2), contrast effects were smaller following 200 Talkers/200 Sentences compared to single-talker conditions. Constant recalibration to new talkers reduced listeners' sensitivity to modest spectral peaks, diminishing contrast effects. Results bridge conflicting reports of whether talker information influences spectral contrast effects in speech categorization. (C) 2015 Acoustical Society of America.
引用
收藏
页码:3023 / 3032
页数:10
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Praat: doing phonetics by computer (Version 6.0.47)
[2]   VOWEL IDENTIFICATION - ORTHOGRAPHIC, PERCEPTUAL, AND ACOUSTIC ASPECTS [J].
ASSMANN, PF ;
NEAREY, TM ;
HOGAN, JT .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1982, 71 (04) :975-989
[3]   Vowel normalization and the perception of speaker changes: An exploration of the contextual tuning hypothesis [J].
Barreda, Santiago .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2012, 132 (05) :3453-3464
[4]   CASE OF THE UNKNOWN TALKER [J].
CREELMAN, CD .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1957, 29 (05) :655-655
[5]   Compensation for coarticulation reflects gesture perception, not spectral contrast [J].
Fowler, CA .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2006, 68 (02) :161-177
[6]  
Garofolo J., 1990, NIST Order No. PB91-505065
[7]   Words and voices: Episodic traces in spoken word identification and recognition memory [J].
Goldinger, SD .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1996, 22 (05) :1166-1183
[8]   From fush to feesh:: Exemplar priming in speech perception [J].
Hay, Jennifer ;
Nolan, Aaron ;
Drager, Katie .
LINGUISTIC REVIEW, 2006, 23 (03) :351-379
[9]   Factors influencing speech perception in the context of a merger-in-progress [J].
Hay, Jennifer ;
Warren, Paul ;
Drager, Katie .
JOURNAL OF PHONETICS, 2006, 34 (04) :458-484
[10]   Temporally nonadjacent nonlinguistic sounds affect speech categorization [J].
Holt, LL .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2005, 16 (04) :305-312