Group cohesion and adherence in unstructured exercise groups

被引:10
作者
Spink, Kevin S. [1 ]
Ulvick, Jocelyn D. [1 ]
Crozier, Alyson J. [1 ]
Wilson, Kathleen S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Saskatchewan, Coll Kinesiol, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5B2, Canada
[2] Calif State Univ Fullerton, Fullerton, CA 92634 USA
关键词
Cohesion; Adherence; Exercise; Context; YOUTH; DYADS;
D O I
10.1016/j.psychsport.2013.11.008
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Objectives: Previous research has reported a positive relationship between perceptions of cohesion and adherence within structured exercise settings. Given that the social determinants of adherence can vary across situations, this study aimed to examine the cohesion adherence relationship in unstructured exercise settings. Design: This study employed a cross-sectional design. Methods: Young adults (N = 125) recalled an unstructured exercise group where they had been participants, and then rated their perceptions of cohesion with respect to that group as well as reported the number of times/month they had been active in that group. Results: Regression results revealed that cohesion was significantly related to adherence. Individuals who reported higher levels of task and lower levels of social cohesion, with both dimensions of cohesion reflecting the perceptions of the group as a totality, attended more sessions. Conclusions: These findings extend research reporting that the cohesiveness perceived in a structured exercise group is related to adherence. However, there were two findings that were not consistent with previous research. The failure of the task dimension associated with satisfying personal needs and objectives to emerge as well as the emergence of a negative relationship with one of the social dimensions of cohesion suggest that the relationship between cohesion and adherence may play out differently in an unstructured versus structured setting with young adults. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:293 / 298
页数:6
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Effects of minimal group promotion on cohesion and exercise adherence [J].
Annesi, JJ .
SMALL GROUP RESEARCH, 1999, 30 (05) :542-557
[2]  
Bostick J., 2003, 2003 CAN SOC PSYCH L
[3]   Effects of Team Building on Exercise Adherence and Group Task Satisfaction in a Youth Activity Setting [J].
Bruner, Mark W. ;
Spink, Kevin S. .
GROUP DYNAMICS-THEORY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2011, 15 (02) :161-172
[4]  
Burke S., 2008, INT REV SPORT EXER P, V1, P107, DOI DOI 10.1080/17509840802227065
[5]  
Canadian Fitness & Lifestyle Research Institute, 1997, BULLETIN, V22
[6]  
Carron A.V., 2008, Advances in sport psychology, V3rd, P213
[7]   GROUP COHESION AND INDIVIDUAL ADHERENCE TO PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY [J].
CARRON, AV ;
WIDMEYER, WN ;
BRAWLEY, LR .
JOURNAL OF SPORT & EXERCISE PSYCHOLOGY, 1988, 10 (02) :127-138
[8]   THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN INSTRUMENT TO ASSESS COHESION IN SPORT TEAMS - THE GROUP ENVIRONMENT QUESTIONNAIRE [J].
CARRON, AV ;
WIDMEYER, WN ;
BRAWLEY, LR .
JOURNAL OF SPORT PSYCHOLOGY, 1985, 7 (03) :244-266
[9]   THE GROUP-SIZE COHESION RELATIONSHIP IN MINIMAL GROUPS [J].
CARRON, AV ;
SPINK, KS .
SMALL GROUP RESEARCH, 1995, 26 (01) :86-105
[10]   INTERNAL CONSISTENCY OF THE GROUP ENVIRONMENT QUESTIONNAIRE MODIFIED FOR AN EXERCISE SETTING [J].
CARRON, AV ;
SPINK, KS .
PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS, 1992, 74 (01) :304-306