A competitive and cooperative approach to propositional satisfiability

被引:12
作者
Inoue, Katsumi
Soh, Takehide
Ueda, Seiji
Sasaura, Yoshito
Banbara, Mutsunori
Tamura, Naoyuki
机构
[1] Natl Inst Informat, Chiyoda Ku, Tokyo 1018430, Japan
[2] Kobe Univ, Grad Sch Sci & Technol, Kobe, Hyogo 6578501, Japan
[3] Kobe Univ, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, Kobe, Hyogo 6578501, Japan
[4] Kobe Univ, Informat Sci & Technol Ctr, Kobe, Hyogo 6578501, Japan
关键词
SAT; SAT solver; parallel execution; planning; job-shop scheduling;
D O I
10.1016/j.dam.2006.04.015
中图分类号
O29 [应用数学];
学科分类号
070104 ;
摘要
Propositional satisfiability (SAT) has attracted considerable attention recently in both Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, and a lot of algorithms have been developed for solving SAT. Each SAT solver has strength and weakness, and it is difficult to develop a universal SAT solver which can efficiently solve a wide range of SAT instances. We thus propose parallel execution of SAT solvers each of which individually solves the same SAT instance simultaneously. With this competitive approach, a variety of SAT instances can be solved efficiently in average. We then consider a cooperative method for solving SAT by exchanging lemmas derived by conflict analysis among different SAT solvers. To show the usefulness of our approach, we solve SATLIB benchmark problems, planning benchmark problems as well as the job-shop scheduling problem with good performance. The system has been implemented in Java with both systematic and stochastic solvers. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2291 / 2306
页数:16
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
BANBARA M, 2005, P 16 INT C APPL DECL, P45
[2]  
BANBARA M, HECS HETEROGENEOUS C
[3]  
Biere A, 1999, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V1579, P193
[4]   Parallel propositional satisfiability checking with distributed dynamic learning [J].
Blochinger, W ;
Sinz, C ;
Küchlin, W .
PARALLEL COMPUTING, 2003, 29 (07) :969-994
[5]   Fast planning through planning graph analysis [J].
Blum, AL ;
Furst, ML .
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 1997, 90 (1-2) :281-300
[6]  
BOEHM M, 1996, ANN MATH ARTIFICIAL, V17, P381
[7]  
CHRABAKH W, 2003, P ACM IEEE SUP 2003
[8]  
Cook S. A., 1971, P 3 ANN ACM S THEOR, P151, DOI DOI 10.1145/800157.805047
[9]  
CRAWFORD JM, 1994, PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWELFTH NATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, VOLS 1 AND 2, P1092
[10]   A MACHINE PROGRAM FOR THEOREM-PROVING [J].
DAVIS, M ;
LOGEMANN, G ;
LOVELAND, D .
COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 1962, 5 (07) :394-397