Effect of adding cholesterol to bull sperm membranes on sperm capacitation, the acrosome reaction, and fertility

被引:116
|
作者
Purdy, PH [1 ]
Graham, JK [1 ]
机构
[1] Colorado State Univ, Dept Biomed Sci, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
关键词
acrosome reaction; gamete biology; sperm capacitation;
D O I
10.1095/biolreprod.103.025577
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
When cholesterol is added to sperm membranes before cryopreservation, higher percentages of motile and viable cells are recovered after thawing. However, because one of the first steps in sperm capacitation is cholesterol efflux from the sperm plasma membrane, adding cholesterol to enhance cryosurvival may retard sperm capacitation. These studies evaluated the ability of sperm treated with cholesterol-loaded cyclodextrins (CLC) to capacitate, acrosome react, and fertilize oocytes. Control (non-CLC-treated) and CLC-treated sperm were treated with heparin, dilauroylphosphatidylcholine (PC12), or calcium ionophore A23187 (A23187) to capacitate and induce the acrosome reaction. Sperm capacitation, assessed by an increase in intracellular calcium level, and acrosome-reacted sperm were measured using flow cytometry. Fresh CLC-treated sperm cells underwent capacitation and/or the acrosome reaction at rates different from control samples, and the differences detected were dependent on the method used to induce sperm capacitation and the acrosome reaction. After cryopreservation, however, CLC-treated and control sperm underwent capacitation and the acrosome reaction at similar rates regardless of the method used to induce capacitation and the acrosome reaction. The primary concern for CLC-treated sperm, however, is whether this treatment would affect in vitro or in vivo fertility. Adding either control or CLC-treated cryopreserved sperm to bovine oocytes in vitro resulted in similar oocyte cleavage rates and blastocyst formation rates. In addition, when inseminated into heifers, pregnancy rates for control and CLC-treated sperm were also similar. Therefore, treating bull sperm with CLC permits greater numbers of sperm to survive cryopreservation while preserving the fertilizing potential of each individual sperm.
引用
收藏
页码:522 / 527
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Sperm Capacitation and Acrosome Reaction in Mammalian Sperm
    Stival, Cintia
    Puga Molina, Lis del C.
    Paudel, Bidur
    Buffone, Mariano G.
    Visconti, Pablo E.
    Krapf, Dario
    SPERM ACROSOME BIOGENESIS AND FUNCTION DURING FERTILIZATION, 2016, 220 : 93 - 106
  • [2] SPERM CAPACITATION AND THE ACROSOME REACTION
    STOREY, BT
    ANNALS OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES-SERIES, 1991, 637 : 459 - 473
  • [3] Sperm capacitation and the acrosome reaction
    Fraser, LR
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1998, 13 : 9 - 19
  • [4] Effect of sperm-agglutinating antibodies on sperm capacitation and acrosome reaction
    Bathla, H
    Sidhu, KS
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FERTILITY AND MENOPAUSAL STUDIES, 1996, 41 (06) : 528 - 533
  • [5] ACROSOME REACTION AS EFFECT OF ADDITION OF CHOLESTEROL TO BOAR SPERM MEMBRANES
    Torres, C. A. A.
    Moraes, E. A.
    Graham, J. K.
    Romualdo, P. L.
    REPRODUCTION FERTILITY AND DEVELOPMENT, 2010, 22 (01) : 219 - 219
  • [6] Effect of estrogens on sperm capacitation and acrosome reaction in vitro
    Ded, L.
    Dorosh, A.
    Dostalova, P.
    Peknicova, J.
    JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE IMMUNOLOGY, 2009, 81 (02) : 155 - 155
  • [7] HUMAN SPERM CAPACITATION AND THE ACROSOME REACTION
    ZANEVELD, LJD
    DEJONGE, CJ
    ANDERSON, RA
    MACK, SR
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1991, 6 (09) : 1265 - 1274
  • [8] Capacitation and the acrosome reaction in equine sperm
    Gadella, BM
    Rathi, R
    Brouwers, JFHM
    Stout, TAE
    Colenbrander, B
    ANIMAL REPRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2001, 68 (3-4) : 249 - 265
  • [9] EFFECT OF HEPARIN ON CAPACITATION/ACROSOME REACTION OF EQUINE SPERM
    VARNER, DD
    BOWEN, JA
    JOHNSON, L
    ARCHIVES OF ANDROLOGY, 1993, 31 (03): : 199 - 207
  • [10] Effect of progesterone on bovine sperm capacitation and acrosome reaction
    Thérien, I
    Manjunath, P
    BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION, 2003, 69 (04) : 1408 - 1415