Validation of the pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) system in left lateral position

被引:13
|
作者
Digesu, G. Alessandro [1 ]
Athanasiou, Stavros [2 ]
Cardozo, Linda [3 ]
Hill, Simon [4 ]
Khullar, Vik [1 ]
机构
[1] St Marys Hosp, Dept Urogynaecol, London, England
[2] Alexandra Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol 1, Urogynaecol Unit, Athens, Greece
[3] Kings Coll Hosp London, Dept Urogynaecol, London, England
[4] Royal Blackburn Hosp, Dept Urogynaecol, Blackburn, Lancs, England
关键词
POP-Q; Sims; Position; Pelvic organ prolapse; Vaginal examination; Women; INTERNATIONAL-CONTINENCE-SOCIETY; CLASSIFICATION-SYSTEM; INTEROBSERVER; RELIABILITY; BLADDER;
D O I
10.1007/s00192-009-0884-z
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study is to examine the inter-observer reliability of the pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) system in left lateral position. Women attending urogynaecology outpatient clinics were examined in the left lateral position using a digital examination and POP-Q. This was repeated separately by a second blinded clinician. The inter-observer agreement was calculated using the Cohen's kappa coefficient. The POP-Q examination was then performed with a woman lying in dorsal lithotomy position. The POP-Q findings in the two positions were compared. Two hundred and eighteen women were recruited. The digital examination had a moderate inter-observer reliability with a kappa value of 0.54. The POP-Q showed a high degree of reliability (0.88). There was a high degree of correlation between the POP-Q findings in left lateral and lithotomy position (rho > 0.95, p < 0.001). The POP-Q in the left lateral position is reliable, easy to perform, acceptable for patients, and is not a time-consuming examination.
引用
收藏
页码:979 / 983
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Defecatory dysfunction and fecal incontinence in women with or without posterior vaginal wall prolapse as measured by pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q)
    Augusto, Kathiane Lustosa
    Pinheiro Sobreira Bezerra, Leonardo Robson
    Murad-Regadas, Sthela Maria
    Vasconcelos Neto, Jose Ananias
    Moreira Vasconcelos, Camila Teixeira
    Lino Karbage, Sara Arcanjo
    Monteiro Bilhar, Andreisa Paiva
    Pinheiro Regadas, Francisco Sergio
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2017, 214 : 50 - 55
  • [22] Use of the Pelvic Organ Quantification System (POP-Q) in published articles of peer-reviewed journals
    Boyd, Sarah S.
    O'Sullivan, David
    Tulikangas, Paul
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2017, 28 (11) : 1719 - 1723
  • [23] Use of the Pelvic Organ Quantification System (POP-Q) in published articles of peer-reviewed journals
    Sarah S. Boyd
    David O’Sullivan
    Paul Tulikangas
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2017, 28 : 1719 - 1723
  • [24] Comparison of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification and Simplified Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification Systems in Clinical Staging of Iranian Women with Pelvic Organ Prolapse
    Ghanbari, Zinat
    Peivandi, Saloumeh
    Pasikhani, Maryam Deldar
    Darabi, Foroohar
    ETHIOPIAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH SCIENCES, 2020, 30 (06) : 921 - 928
  • [25] Anogenital Distance and Perineal Measurements of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP) Quantification System
    Luisa Sanchez-Ferrer, Maria
    Teresa Prieto-Sanchez, Maria
    Moya-Jimenez, Carlos
    Mendiola, Jaime
    Maria Garcia-Hernandez, Carmen
    Carmona-Barnosi, Ana
    Nieto, Anibal
    Torres-Cantero, Alberto M.
    JOVE-JOURNAL OF VISUALIZED EXPERIMENTS, 2018, (139):
  • [26] Center-by-center results of a multicenter prospective trial to determine the inter-observer correlation of the simplified POP-Q in describing pelvic organ prolapse
    Lemos, N.
    Korte, J. E.
    Iskander, M.
    Freeman, R.
    Arunkalaivanan, A.
    Rizk, D.
    Halaska, M.
    Medina, C.
    Conceicao, J. C.
    Parekh, M.
    Martan, A.
    Sorinola, O.
    Wlazlak, E.
    Ghoniem, Gamal
    Swift, S.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2012, 23 (05) : 579 - 584
  • [27] Erroneous and Incomplete Reporting of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System
    Younes, Melissa M.
    Raoofi, Mooska
    Carey, Marcus
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2025, 36 (02) : 243 - 252
  • [28] Comparison of transperineal ultrasound with POP-Q for assessing symptoms of prolapse
    Volloyhaug, Ingrid
    Rojas, Rodrigo Guzman
    Morkved, Siv
    Salvesen, Kjell Asmund
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2019, 30 (04) : 595 - 602
  • [29] Relationship between the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system (POP-Q), the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7), and the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) before and after anterior vaginal wall prolapse surgery
    Teleman, P.
    Laurikainen, E.
    Kinne, I.
    Pogosean, R.
    Jakobsson, U.
    Rudnicki, M.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2015, 26 (02) : 195 - 200
  • [30] A review of the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system in China
    Wang, Yi-ting
    Jiang, Jun-ying
    Han, Jin-song
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2016, 27 (02) : 287 - 290