Validation of the pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) system in left lateral position

被引:13
作者
Digesu, G. Alessandro [1 ]
Athanasiou, Stavros [2 ]
Cardozo, Linda [3 ]
Hill, Simon [4 ]
Khullar, Vik [1 ]
机构
[1] St Marys Hosp, Dept Urogynaecol, London, England
[2] Alexandra Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol 1, Urogynaecol Unit, Athens, Greece
[3] Kings Coll Hosp London, Dept Urogynaecol, London, England
[4] Royal Blackburn Hosp, Dept Urogynaecol, Blackburn, Lancs, England
关键词
POP-Q; Sims; Position; Pelvic organ prolapse; Vaginal examination; Women; INTERNATIONAL-CONTINENCE-SOCIETY; CLASSIFICATION-SYSTEM; INTEROBSERVER; RELIABILITY; BLADDER;
D O I
10.1007/s00192-009-0884-z
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study is to examine the inter-observer reliability of the pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) system in left lateral position. Women attending urogynaecology outpatient clinics were examined in the left lateral position using a digital examination and POP-Q. This was repeated separately by a second blinded clinician. The inter-observer agreement was calculated using the Cohen's kappa coefficient. The POP-Q examination was then performed with a woman lying in dorsal lithotomy position. The POP-Q findings in the two positions were compared. Two hundred and eighteen women were recruited. The digital examination had a moderate inter-observer reliability with a kappa value of 0.54. The POP-Q showed a high degree of reliability (0.88). There was a high degree of correlation between the POP-Q findings in left lateral and lithotomy position (rho > 0.95, p < 0.001). The POP-Q in the left lateral position is reliable, easy to perform, acceptable for patients, and is not a time-consuming examination.
引用
收藏
页码:979 / 983
页数:5
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
Altman DG., 1996, PRACTICAL STAT MED R, V7th
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1979, RELIABILITY VALIDITY
[3]   Is the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (POPQ) being used? A survey of members of the International Continence Society (ICS) and the American Urogynecologic Society (AUGS) [J].
Auwad, W ;
Freeman, RM ;
Swift, S .
INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2004, 15 (05) :324-327
[4]   Effect of patient position on clinical evaluation of pelvic organ prolapse [J].
Barber, MD ;
Lambers, AR ;
Visco, AG ;
Bump, RC .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 96 (01) :18-22
[5]   The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction [J].
Bump, RC ;
Mattiasson, A ;
Bo, K ;
Brubaker, LP ;
DeLancey, JOL ;
Klarskov, P ;
Shull, BL ;
Smith, ARB .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 175 (01) :10-17
[6]   Inter-observer reliability of digital vaginal examination using a four-grade scale in different patient positions [J].
Digesu, G. Alessandro ;
Khullar, Vik ;
Cardozo, Linda ;
Robinson, Dudley .
INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2008, 19 (09) :1303-1307
[7]  
Grody Marvin H. Terry, 1997, P1044
[8]   Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the proposed International Continence Society, Society of Gynecologic Surgeons, and American Urogynecologic Society pelvic organ prolapse classification system [J].
Hall, AF ;
Theofrastous, JP ;
Cundiff, GW ;
Harris, RL ;
Hamilton, LF ;
Swift, SE ;
Bump, RC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 175 (06) :1467-1470
[9]   Management of complex pelvic floor disorders in a multidisciplinary pelvic floor clinic [J].
Kapoor, D. S. ;
Sultan, A. H. ;
Thakar, R. ;
Abulafi, M. A. ;
Swift, R. I. ;
Ness, W. .
COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2008, 10 (02) :118-123
[10]  
Nunnally J., 1978, PSYCHOMETRIC THEORY