Patient Reflections on Decision Making for Laryngeal Cancer Treatment

被引:53
作者
Shuman, Andrew G. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Larkin, Knoll [3 ]
Thomas, Dorothy [1 ]
Palmer, Frank L. [1 ]
Fins, Joseph J. [2 ]
Baxi, Shrujal S. [4 ]
Lee, Nancy [5 ]
Shah, Jatin P. [1 ]
Fagerlin, Angela [3 ,6 ,7 ]
Patel, Snehal G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Head & Neck Serv, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10021 USA
[2] Weill Cornell Med Coll, Div Med Eth, New York, NY USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Ctr Bioeth & Social Sci Med, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[4] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Med, Head & Neck Oncol Serv, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10021 USA
[5] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10021 USA
[6] Univ Michigan, Dept Internal Med, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[7] VA Ann Arbor Ctr Clin Res Management, Washington, DC USA
关键词
larynx cancer; patient-reported outcomes; shared decision making; quality of life; NECK-CANCER; VALIDATION; QUALITY; LIFE; HEAD; OUTCOMES; MANAGEMENT; IMPACT; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1177/0194599816683377
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Objective. To describe the reflections of patients treated for laryngeal cancer with regard to treatment-related decision making. Study Design. Cross-sectional survey-based pilot study. Setting. Single-institution tertiary care cancer center. Subjects/Methods. Adults with laryngeal carcinoma were eligible to participate (N = 57; 46% treated surgically, 54% non-surgically). Validated surveys measuring decisional conflict and regret explored patients' reflections on their preferences and priorities regarding treatment-related decision making for laryngeal cancer and how patient-reported functional outcomes, professional referral patterns, and desired provider input influenced these reflections. Results. When considering the level of involvement of surgeons, radiation oncologists, and medical oncologists in their care, patients were more likely to believe that the specialist whom they saw first was the most important factor in deciding how to treat their cancer (Fisher's exact, similar to chi(2) = 16.2, df = 6, P = .02). Patients who were treated for laryngeal cancer who reported worse voice-related quality of life recalled more decisional conflict (P = .01) and experienced more decisional regret (P < .001). Of the patients for whom speech was a top priority prior to treatment, better voice-related quality of life overall scores were correlated with less decision regret about treatment decisions (P < .02). Of the patients for whom eating and drinking were top priorities prior to treatment, better MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory global scores were correlated with less decision regret about treatment decisions (P < .002). Conclusion. Patient priorities and attitudes, coupled with functional outcomes and professional referral patterns, influence how patients reflect on their choices regarding management of laryngeal cancer. Better understanding of these variables may assist in ensuring that patients' voices are integrated into individualized laryngeal cancer treatment planning.
引用
收藏
页码:299 / 304
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[11]   Total laryngectomy or laryngeal preservation for advanced laryngeal cancer. Impact of the functional risk upon the patient's preferences [J].
Laccourreye, O. ;
Malinvaud, D. ;
Menard, M. ;
Consoli, S. ;
Giraud, P. ;
Bonfils, P. .
EUROPEAN ANNALS OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK DISEASES, 2014, 131 (02) :93-97
[12]   Satisfaction with surgery outcomes and the decision process in a population-based sample of women with breast cancer [J].
Lantz, PM ;
Janz, NK ;
Fagerlin, A ;
Schwartz, K ;
Liu, LH ;
Lakhani, I ;
Salem, B ;
Katz, SJ .
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2005, 40 (03) :745-767
[13]   Patient-reported outcomes in cancer: A review of recent research and policy initiatives [J].
Lipscomb, Joseph ;
Gotay, Carolyn C. ;
Snyder, Claire E. .
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2007, 57 (05) :278-300
[14]   Prioritizing treatment outcomes: Head and neck cancer patients versus nonpatients [J].
List, MA ;
Rutherford, JL ;
Stracks, J ;
Pauloski, BR ;
Logemann, JA ;
Lundy, D ;
Sullivan, P ;
Goodwin, W ;
Kies, M ;
Vokes, EE .
HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2004, 26 (02) :163-170
[15]   SPEECH AND SURVIVAL - TRADEOFFS BETWEEN QUALITY AND QUANTITY OF LIFE IN LARYNGEAL-CANCER [J].
MCNEIL, BJ ;
WEICHSELBAUM, R ;
PAUKER, SG .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1981, 305 (17) :982-987
[16]   Management of T1-T2 glottic carcinomas [J].
Mendenhall, WM ;
Werning, JW ;
Hinerman, RW ;
Amdur, RJ ;
Villaret, DB .
CANCER, 2004, 100 (09) :1786-1792
[17]  
National Comprehensive Cancer Network, 2000, COMPL LIB NCCN ONC P
[18]   VALIDATION OF A DECISIONAL CONFLICT SCALE [J].
OCONNOR, AM .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1995, 15 (01) :25-30
[19]   A systematic review of head and neck cancer quality of life assessment instruments [J].
Ojo, Bukola ;
Genden, Eric M. ;
Teng, Marita S. ;
Milbury, Kathrin ;
Misiukiewicz, Krzysztof J. ;
Badr, Hoda .
ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 48 (10) :923-937
[20]   DECISION-ANALYSIS OF TREATMENT OPTIONS IN PYRIFORM SINUS CARCINOMA [J].
PLANTE, DA ;
PICCIRILLO, JF ;
SOFFERMAN, RA .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1987, 7 (02) :74-83