Biomethane liquefaction: A systematic comparative analysis of refrigeration technologies

被引:32
作者
Capra, Federico [1 ,2 ]
Magli, Francesco [1 ,2 ]
Gatti, Manuele [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Politecn Milan, Dept Energy, Via Lambruschini 4, I-20156 Milan, Italy
[2] LEAP, Via Nino Bixio 27-C, I-29121 Piacenza, Italy
关键词
Biogas; Liquid biomethane; Bio-LNG; Refrigeration cycles; Process design &optimization; Techno-economic analysis;
D O I
10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.113815
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
This work presents a comparative technical and economic analysis of alternative refrigeration technologies for the production of liquefied biomethane (a liquid biofuel also known as bio-LNG). These processes are designed for biogas plants (size: 1-10 t(CH4)/day), where they can be installed downstream of the biogas upgrading step, to bring biomethane (essentially pure CH4) from the gaseous to the liquid phase, at - 152 degrees C and 2 bar. Five technologies are considered: liquid nitrogen vaporization (benchmark); reverse Rankine cycle with mixed refrigerant; reverse Brayton cycle; Claude cycle; reverse Stirling cycle. The energetic and economic analyses are carried out, under a consistent methodology (reference production capacity of 4.6 t(CH4)/day), based on Aspen Plus process modelling and simulation for the calculation of the heat and mass balances, linked with ad-hoc Matlab algorithms for equipment sizing and cost estimation, and adopting the PGS-COM numerical optimizer for the selection of the optimal process conditions. The Rankine cycle with mixed-refrigerant turns out to be the best option, with an electric consumption of 3061 KJ/kg(CH4), and a levelized biomethane liquefaction cost of 6.3(sic)/GJ(LHV). However, for liquid nitrogen supply costs lower than 66(sic)/t(N2), liquid nitrogen vaporization, the least capital-intensive option, becomes the favourite solution. Finally, sensitivity analysis on the key variables is carried out to give a broader perspective to the technoeconomic assessment.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 61 条
[21]  
Bortoluzzi G., 2018, LCA FILIERA BIOMETAN
[22]   Biomethane Production from Agricultural Resources in the Italian Scenario: Techno-Economic Analysis of Water Wash [J].
Bortoluzzi, Giulio ;
Gatti, Manuele ;
Sogni, Alberto ;
Consonni, Stefano .
ICONBM: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOMASS, PTS 1 AND 2, 2014, 37 :259-264
[23]  
Bowdery T., 2006, 6 TOP C NAT GAS UT O
[24]  
BP, 2018, EN OUTL
[25]  
Branchini L, 2018, PRODUZIONE LNG PICCO
[26]   Robustness analysis of the mixed refrigerant composition employed in the single mixed refrigerant (SMR) liquefied natural gas (LNG) process [J].
Cao, Le ;
Liu, Jinping ;
Xu, Xiongwen .
APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 93 :1155-1163
[27]  
Chakravarthy Vijayaraghavan S., 2011, Journal of Thermal Science and Engineering Applications, V3, DOI 10.1115/1.4003701
[28]  
Del Campo O., 2013, CRYOBOX NANO LNG TEC, P1
[29]  
Dioguardi F, 2013, NORD BIOG C
[30]  
Ecospray, 2018, BIOG UPGR BIOM LIQ