Biomethane liquefaction: A systematic comparative analysis of refrigeration technologies

被引:32
作者
Capra, Federico [1 ,2 ]
Magli, Francesco [1 ,2 ]
Gatti, Manuele [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Politecn Milan, Dept Energy, Via Lambruschini 4, I-20156 Milan, Italy
[2] LEAP, Via Nino Bixio 27-C, I-29121 Piacenza, Italy
关键词
Biogas; Liquid biomethane; Bio-LNG; Refrigeration cycles; Process design &optimization; Techno-economic analysis;
D O I
10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.113815
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
This work presents a comparative technical and economic analysis of alternative refrigeration technologies for the production of liquefied biomethane (a liquid biofuel also known as bio-LNG). These processes are designed for biogas plants (size: 1-10 t(CH4)/day), where they can be installed downstream of the biogas upgrading step, to bring biomethane (essentially pure CH4) from the gaseous to the liquid phase, at - 152 degrees C and 2 bar. Five technologies are considered: liquid nitrogen vaporization (benchmark); reverse Rankine cycle with mixed refrigerant; reverse Brayton cycle; Claude cycle; reverse Stirling cycle. The energetic and economic analyses are carried out, under a consistent methodology (reference production capacity of 4.6 t(CH4)/day), based on Aspen Plus process modelling and simulation for the calculation of the heat and mass balances, linked with ad-hoc Matlab algorithms for equipment sizing and cost estimation, and adopting the PGS-COM numerical optimizer for the selection of the optimal process conditions. The Rankine cycle with mixed-refrigerant turns out to be the best option, with an electric consumption of 3061 KJ/kg(CH4), and a levelized biomethane liquefaction cost of 6.3(sic)/GJ(LHV). However, for liquid nitrogen supply costs lower than 66(sic)/t(N2), liquid nitrogen vaporization, the least capital-intensive option, becomes the favourite solution. Finally, sensitivity analysis on the key variables is carried out to give a broader perspective to the technoeconomic assessment.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
AACE (Association for the Advancement of Cost Engineering), 2011, AACE INT REC PRACT N
[2]   Performance Increase of a Small-Scale Liquefied Natural Gas Production Process by Means of Turbo-Expander [J].
Ancona, M. A. ;
Bianchi, M. ;
Branchini, L. ;
De Pascale, A. ;
Melino, F. .
8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLIED ENERGY (ICAE2016), 2017, 105
[3]  
Andreola M., 2012, ENA EC C
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2018, NAT GAS SMALL SCAL L
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2018, AIR LIQUIDE TURBO BR
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2018, MATLAB
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2018, NAN GREEND WAY
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2015, C GNL
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2017, IT NAT EN STRAT 2017
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2006, IFAC P, V39, P241, DOI [10.3182/20060402-4-BR-2902.00241, DOI 10.3182/20060402-4-BR-2902.00241]