Does multimedia learning theory extend to middle-school students?

被引:51
作者
McTigue, Erin M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, TLAC, College Stn, TX 77845 USA
关键词
Graphical representations; Reading comprehension; Middle grade students; Science text; Diagrams; TEXT; ILLUSTRATIONS; COMPREHENSION; DEMANDS; WORDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.12.003
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study is to translate principles of multimedia learning from college-age readers to middle grade students, when reading science texts with a supporting diagram. In this experimental study, sixth-grade students (n = 180) were randomly assigned to display conditions before reading. Each student read two explanatory sciences passages, a life-science and a physical science text. Passages were accompanied by either no illustrations (control), illustrations of the cycle with labels for each part (parts), illustrations of the cycle with labels for each major process (steps), or illustrations showing the labels for each part and each major process (parts and steps). Additionally, there were two text conditions in which half of the students read standard text (control) and half read texts with cues which indicated to students when to access the diagrams (cued). Through ANOVA analysis, in the life-science text students showed modest improvement (partial eta(2) = 18)from the addition of diagrams, with the parts diagram and the steps diagram outperforming the control. In the physical science text, students did not receive benefit from the diagrams. Findings did not replicate results from college-age readers to younger readers, nor between the two texts with younger readers. These results raise concern for the application of multimedia design theory to classroom practice. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:143 / 153
页数:11
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
Anderson J., 2001, Reading Online, V4
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Australian Science Teachers Journal
[3]  
[Anonymous], BRIT J ED PSYCHOL
[4]   REVISING SOCIAL-STUDIES TEXT FROM A TEXT-PROCESSING PERSPECTIVE - EVIDENCE OF IMPROVED COMPREHENSIBILITY [J].
BECK, IL ;
MCKEOWN, MG ;
SINATRA, GM ;
LOXTERMAN, JA .
READING RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 1991, 26 (03) :251-276
[5]  
BIESTY S, 1993, S BIESTYS CROSS SECT
[6]   RANDOMIZED FIELD EXPERIMENTS FOR PROGRAM PLANNING, DEVELOPMENT, AND EVALUATION - ILLUSTRATIVE BIBLIOGRAPHY [J].
BORUCH, RF ;
MCSWEENY, AJ ;
SODERSTROM, EJ .
EVALUATION QUARTERLY, 1978, 2 (04) :655-695
[7]   Why students may not learn to interpret scientific inscriptions [J].
Bowen, GM ;
Roth, WM .
RESEARCH IN SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2002, 32 (03) :303-327
[8]  
CEZAIRILIYAN A, 2005, HEAT
[9]  
COLEMAN J, ELEMENTARY TEA UNPUB
[10]  
DAVEY B, 1988, J READING, V31, P340