Cost-Benefit Analysis of Landscape Restoration: A Stocktake

被引:25
作者
Wainaina, Priscilla [1 ]
Minang, Peter A. [1 ]
Gituku, Eunice [1 ]
Duguma, Lalisa [1 ]
机构
[1] World Agroforestry Ctr, UN Ave, Nairobi 00100, Kenya
关键词
cost-benefit analysis; landscape restoration; global; stocktake; DRYLAND FOREST RESTORATION; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; SPATIAL-ANALYSIS; AREAS;
D O I
10.3390/land9110465
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
With the increase in demand for landscape restoration and the limited resources available, there is need for economic analysis of landscape restoration to help prioritize investment of the resources. Cost-benefit analysis (CBA) is a commonly applied tool in the economic analysis of landscape restoration, yet its application seems limited and varied. We undertake a review of CBA applications to understand the breadth, depth, and gaps. Of the 2056 studies identified in literature search, only 31 met our predefined criteria. Three studies offered a global perspective, while more than half were conducted in Africa. Only six countries benefit from at least 2 CBA studies, including Brazil, Ethiopia, Kenya, Vietnam, South Africa, and Tanzania. About 60% focus on agroforestry, afforestation, reforestation, and assisted natural regeneration practices. Only 16% covered all cost categories, with opportunity costs being the least covered. Eighty-four percent apply direct use values, while only 16% captured the non-use values. Similarly, lack of reliable data due to predictions and assumptions involved in data generation influenced CBA results. The limited number of eligible studies and the weaknesses identified hereinabove suggest strong need for improvements in both the quantity and quality of CBA to better inform planning, policies, and investments in landscape restoration.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 25
页数:25
相关论文
共 57 条
[21]  
ELD Initiative, 2015, EC LAND DEGR AFR BEN
[22]   Benefits of restoring ecosystem services in urban areas [J].
Elmqvist, T. ;
Setala, H. ;
Handel, S. N. ;
van der Ploeg, S. ;
Aronson, J. ;
Blignaut, J. N. ;
Gomez-Baggethun, E. ;
Nowak, D. J. ;
Kronenberg, J. ;
de Groot, R. .
CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2015, 14 :101-108
[23]  
Gasparinetti P., 2019, EC FEASIBILITY STUDY
[24]  
Gianvenuti A, 2018, Cost-benefit analysis of forestry interventions for supplying woodfuel in a refugee situation in the United Republic of Tanzania
[25]  
Gichuki L., 2019, Reviving land and restoring landscapes (No. BOOK_B)
[26]  
Gromko D., 2019, EC FOREST LANDSCAPE
[27]  
Gundimeda H., 2018, TEEB AGR FOOD SCI EC, P247
[28]  
Hofer C.T., 2010, CARBON FINANCE CATTL
[29]   When and where to actively restore ecosystems? [J].
Holl, K. D. ;
Aide, T. M. .
FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2011, 261 (10) :1558-1563
[30]  
Holmes P.M., 2007, RESTORING NATURAL CA, P188