Is NSGA-II Ready for Large-Scale Multi-Objective Optimization?

被引:11
作者
Nebro, Antonio J. [1 ,2 ]
Galeano-Brajones, Jesus [3 ]
Luna, Francisco [1 ,2 ]
Coello Coello, Carlos A. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Malaga, ITIS Software, Ada Byron Res Bldg, Malaga 29071, Spain
[2] Univ Malaga, Dept Lenguajes & Ciencias Comp, ETS Ingn Informat, Malaga 29071, Spain
[3] Univ Extremadura, Ctr Univ Merida, Dept Ingn Sistemas Informat & Telemat, Badajoz 06800, Spain
[4] CINVESTAV IPN, Evolutionary Computat Grp, Ciudad De Mexico 07360, Mexico
关键词
NSGA-II; auto-configuration and auto-design of metaheuristics; large-scale multi-objective optimization; real-world problems optimization; ALGORITHM; NETWORKS;
D O I
10.3390/mca27060103
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
NSGA-II is, by far, the most popular metaheuristic that has been adopted for solving multi-objective optimization problems. However, its most common usage, particularly when dealing with continuous problems, is circumscribed to a standard algorithmic configuration similar to the one described in its seminal paper. In this work, our aim is to show that the performance of NSGA-II, when properly configured, can be significantly improved in the context of large-scale optimization. It leverages a combination of tools for automated algorithmic tuning called irace, and a highly configurable version of NSGA-II available in the jMetal framework. Two scenarios are devised: first, by solving the Zitzler-Deb-Thiele (ZDT) test problems, and second, when dealing with a binary real-world problem of the telecommunications domain. Our experiments reveal that an auto-configured version of NSGA-II can properly address test problems ZDT1 and ZDT2 with up to 2(17)=131,072 decision variables. The same methodology, when applied to the telecommunications problem, shows that significant improvements can be obtained with respect to the original NSGA-II algorithm when solving problems with thousands of bits.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Fine-tuning of algorithms using fractional experimental designs and local search [J].
Adenso-Díaz, B ;
Laguna, M .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2006, 54 (01) :99-114
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2015, P COMP PUBL 2015 ANN, DOI DOI 10.1145/2739482.2768462
[3]  
Becerra D, 2010, IEEE INT C BIOINFORM, P137, DOI 10.1109/BIBM.2010.5706552
[4]   Automatically Designing State-of-the-Art Multi- and Many-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms [J].
Bezerra, Leonardo C. T. ;
Lopez-Ibanez, Manuel ;
Stutzle, Thomas .
EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2020, 28 (02) :195-226
[5]   Automatic Component-Wise Design of Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms [J].
Bezerra, Leonardo C. T. ;
Lopez-Ibanez, Manuel ;
Stutzle, Thomas .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2016, 20 (03) :403-417
[6]   MO-ParamILS: A Multi-objective Automatic Algorithm Configuration Framework [J].
Blot, Aymeric ;
Hoos, Holger H. ;
Jourdan, Laetitia ;
Kessaci-Marmion, Marie-Eleonore ;
Trautmann, Heike .
LEARNING AND INTELLIGENT OPTIMIZATION (LION 10), 2016, 10079 :32-47
[7]   How to Meet Increased Capacities by Future Green 5G Networks: A Survey [J].
Bohli, Afef ;
Bouallegue, Ridha .
IEEE ACCESS, 2019, 7 :42220-42237
[8]  
Deb K, 2004, ADV INFO KNOW PROC, P105
[9]   A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II [J].
Deb, K ;
Pratap, A ;
Agarwal, S ;
Meyarivan, T .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2002, 6 (02) :182-197
[10]   jMetal: A Java']Java framework for multi-objective optimization [J].
Durillo, Juan J. ;
Nebro, Antonio J. .
ADVANCES IN ENGINEERING SOFTWARE, 2011, 42 (10) :760-771