Seismic assessment of concrete bridges using inelastic damage analysis

被引:14
作者
Williams, MS [1 ]
Sexsmith, RG [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV BRITISH COLUMBIA,DEPT CIVIL ENGN,VANCOUVER,BC V6T 1Z4,CANADA
关键词
earthquakes; reinforced concrete; bridges; retrofit; inelastic analysis; damage index;
D O I
10.1016/S0141-0296(96)00104-6
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
As increasing numbers of structures are considered as candidates for seismic retrofit, there is a need for simple and objective methods for assessing structures, for making decisions between competing structures, and for comparing different retrofit schemes. The accuracy and objectivity of the assessment process may be enhanced by the use of sophisticated inelastic analysis programs and seismic damage indices, but only if these tools can be shown to be very reliable; currently they are not sufficiently widely used for engineers to have complete confidence in them. Using extensive comparisons with laboratory test results, it is shown that inelastic analysis procedures, together with damage indices, can provide accurate and robust predictions of structural capacity. Recommendations are made for the selection and calibration of damage indices appropriate for use in seismic assessment and retrofit design. Copyright (C) 1996 Elsevier Science Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:208 / 216
页数:9
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] *ACI ASCE COMM 426, 1977, ACI J, V74, P458
  • [2] LIMIT STATES CRITERIA FOR STRUCTURAL EVALUATION OF EXISTING BUILDINGS
    ALLEN, DE
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 1991, 18 (06) : 995 - 1004
  • [3] ANDERSON DL, 1994, 9401 U BRIT COL EART
  • [4] CHUNG YS, 1989, ACI STRUCT J, V86, P259
  • [5] COLLINS MP, 1990, PRESTRESED CONCRETE
  • [6] DIPASQUALE E, 1987, NCEER870015 NAT CTR
  • [7] KIREMIDJIAN AS, 1995, 114 STANF U DEP CIV
  • [8] Kraetzig WB, 1989, Structural safety and reliability, P795
  • [9] Kunnath S K., 1992, Report No. NCEER-92-0022
  • [10] LI KN, 1993, 004 NAT U SING DEP C