HER2 testing by local, central, and reference laboratories in specimens from the North Central Cancer Treatment Group N9831 intergroup adjuvant trial

被引:360
作者
Perez, Edith A.
Suman, Vera J.
Davidson, Nancy E.
Martino, Silvana
Kaufman, Peter A.
Lingle, Wilma L.
Flynn, Patrick J.
Ingle, James N.
Visscher, Daniel
Jenkins, Robert B.
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Jacksonville, FL 32224 USA
[2] Sidney Kimmel Canc Ctr Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD USA
[3] John Wayne Canc Inst, Santa Monica, CA USA
[4] Dartmouth Hitchcock Med Ctr, Norris Cotton Canc Ctr, Lebanon, NH 03766 USA
[5] Metro Minnesota Clin Community Oncol Program, St Louis Pk, MN USA
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2005.03.4744
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose To evaluate concordance between local and central laboratory HER2 testing results in patients from the North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) N9831 adjuvant trial of trastuzumab. Patients and Methods NCCTG N9831 is a randomized, phase III clinical trial comparing three drug regimens: doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel with trastuzumab added concurrently, sequentially, or not at all as adjuvant therapy for women with HER2-positive resected breast cancer. Originally, patients were eligible if their tumors were HER2 positive by either local laboratory immunohistochemistry (IHC) or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). A protocol modification in 2002 made central laboratory testing mandatory, with additional testing of discordant cases conducted by a reference laboratory. Concordance between local and central laboratory, and level of agreement between central and reference laboratory HER2 findings in discordant cases were examined. Results HER2 positivity was confirmed in 85.8% of 2,535 patients registered since March 2002. When local and central evaluation used the same methodology, concordance was 88.1% for FISH and 81.6% for a diagnostic test for presence of the HER2 protein. Among discordant cases examined at the reference laboratory, there was 94.3% agreement for IHC (0, 1+, 2+) and 95.2% agreement for FISH (not gene amplified). Conclusion There was a high degree of discordance between local and central testing for IHC and FISH, but a high degree of agreement between central and reference laboratories. These findings support the importance of using high-volume, experienced laboratories for HER2 testing to improve the process of selecting patients likely to benefit from trastuzumab therapy.
引用
收藏
页码:3032 / 3038
页数:7
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] Anderson S, 2004, J CLIN ONCOL, V22, p854S
  • [2] [Anonymous], NCCN CLIN PRACT GUID
  • [3] 2000 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in breast and colorectal cancer: Clinical practice guidelines of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
    Bast, RC
    Ravdin, P
    Hayes, DF
    Bates, S
    Fritsche, H
    Jessup, JM
    Kemeny, N
    Locker, GY
    Mennel, RG
    Somerfield, MR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 19 (06) : 1865 - 1878
  • [4] BIANCO AR, 1998, P AN M AM SOC CLIN, V17, P97
  • [5] Multinational study of the efficacy and safety of humanized anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody in women who have HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer that has progressed after chemotherapy for metastatic disease
    Cobleigh, MA
    Vogel, CL
    Tripathy, D
    Robert, NJ
    Scholl, S
    Fehrenbacher, L
    Wolter, JM
    Paton, V
    Shak, S
    Lieberman, G
    Slamon, DJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (09) : 2639 - 2648
  • [6] Determination of HER2 gene amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization and concordance with the clinical trials immunohistochemical assay in women with metastatic breast cancer evaluated for treatment with trastuzumab
    Dybdal, N
    Leiberman, G
    Anderson, S
    McCune, B
    Bajamonde, A
    Cohen, RL
    Mass, RD
    Sanders, C
    Press, MF
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2005, 93 (01) : 3 - 11
  • [7] HER-2 testing and trastuzurnab therapy for metastatic breast cancer: A cost-effectiveness analysis
    Elkin, EB
    Weinstein, KC
    Winer, EP
    Kuntz, KM
    Schnitt, SJ
    Weeks, JC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 22 (05) : 854 - 863
  • [8] Fornier M, 2002, ONCOLOGY-NY, V16, P1340
  • [9] The contribution of molecular markers to the prediction of response in the treatment of breast cancer:: A review of the literature on HER-2, p53and BCL-2
    Hamilton, A
    Piccart, M
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2000, 11 (06) : 647 - 663
  • [10] Hammond MEH, 2003, APPL IMMUNOHISTO M M, V11, P103