Quality of control takeover following disengagements in semi-automated vehicles

被引:19
作者
Favaro, Francesca M. [1 ,4 ]
Seewald, Philipp [2 ]
Scholtes, Maike [3 ]
Eurich, Sky [4 ]
机构
[1] San Jose State Univ, Dept Aviat & Technol, San Jose, CA 95192 USA
[2] Fka GmbH, Aachen, Germany
[3] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Inst Automot Engn Ika, Aachen, Germany
[4] San Jose State Univ, Res Ctr RiSA2S, San Jose, CA 95192 USA
关键词
Autonomous vehicles; Vehicle automation; Automated driving; Disengagements; Takeover; Human-in-the-loop; Driving simulator; Takeover request; User study; DRIVER TAKEOVER; TIME; PERFORMANCE; REQUESTS; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.trf.2019.05.004
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
This study examines drivers' responses to automated driving technology failures in semi-automated vehicles. The study is executed in a human-in-the-loop setting, within a high-fidelity integrated car simulator capable of handling both manual and automated driving. A population of 40 individuals was tested, with metrics for control takeover quantification given by vehicle maximum lane offset with respect to the lane centerline, and integral offset over an S-curve turn to compare performance during recovery after automation technology failure and conventional manual driving. Independent variables for the study are the age of the driver, the speed at the time of disengagement, and time at which the disengagement occurs (i.e., how long automation was engaged for). Overall results show better performance for lower speed settings with maximum drift increasing over 116% for higher speed settings. Moreover, contrary to expectations, the age factor was found to be not statistically significant for drift performance, with older participants performing better than or equal to the younger age groups. The time dependency observed was non-linear, and the results highlighted the need for additional testing for this variable. A detailed analysis of variance, as well as preliminary recommendations for regulatory operational limitations, are presented. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:196 / 212
页数:17
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], DO DRIVERS BEHAV HIG
  • [2] [Anonymous], LIC DRIV US DEM 2016
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2013, P HUMAN FACTORS ERGO
  • [4] [Anonymous], US ADAS UN PROD VOL
  • [5] [Anonymous], ART 3 7 AUT VEH TEST
  • [6] Bahram M, 2015, IEEE INT VEH SYM, P913, DOI 10.1109/IVS.2015.7225801
  • [7] Analyzing crowdsourced ratings of speech-based take-over requests for automated driving
    Bazilinskyy, P.
    de Winter, J. C. F.
    [J]. APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 2017, 64 : 56 - 64
  • [8] Blanco M., 2015, 812182 DOT HS
  • [9] Driver brake vs. steer response to sudden forward collision scenario in manual and automated driving modes
    Blommer, Mike
    Curry, Reates
    Swaminathan, Radhakrishnan
    Tijerina, Louis
    Talamonti, Walter
    Kochhar, Dev
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART F-TRAFFIC PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOUR, 2017, 45 : 93 - 101
  • [10] Driving Performance After Self-Regulated Control Transitions in Highly Automated Vehicles
    Eriksson, Alexander
    Stanton, Neville A.
    [J]. HUMAN FACTORS, 2017, 59 (08) : 1233 - 1248