What can vertebrates tell us about segmentation?

被引:20
作者
Graham, Anthony [1 ]
Butts, Thomas [1 ]
Lumsden, Andrew [1 ]
Kiecker, Clemens [1 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll London, MRC Ctr Dev Neurobiol, London SE1 1UL, England
来源
EVODEVO | 2014年 / 5卷
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Segmentation; Metamerism; Somites; Rhombomeres; Pharyngeal arches; Vertebrates; Evolution; NEURAL CREST MIGRATION; CHICK-EMBRYO HINDBRAIN; RETINOIC ACID; LINEAGE RESTRICTIONS; ZEBRAFISH HINDBRAIN; GENE-EXPRESSION; POUCH FORMATION; NERVOUS-SYSTEM; SOMITE; CLOCK;
D O I
10.1186/2041-9139-5-24
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Segmentation is a feature of the body plans of a number of diverse animal groupings, including the annelids, arthropods and chordates. However, it has been unclear whether or not these different manifestations of segmentation are independently derived or have a common origin. Central to this issue is whether or not there are common developmental mechanisms that establish segmentation and the evolutionary origins of these processes. A fruitful way to address this issue is to consider how segmentation in vertebrates is directed. During vertebrate development three different segmental systems are established: the somites, the rhombomeres and the pharyngeal arches. In each an iteration of parts along the long axis is established. However, it is clear that the formation of the somites, rhombomeres or pharyngeal arches have little in common, and as such there is no single segmentation process. These different segmental systems also have distinct evolutionary histories, thus highlighting the fact that segmentation can and does evolve independently at multiple points. We conclude that the term segmentation indicates nothing more than a morphological description and that it implies no mechanistic similarity. Thus it is probable that segmentation has arisen repeatedly during animal evolution.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 62 条
  • [31] Pax-Six-Eya-Dach network during amphioxus development:: Conservation in vitro but context specificity in vivo
    Kozmik, Zbynek
    Holland, Nicholas D.
    Kreslova, Jana
    Oliveri, Diana
    Schubert, Michael
    Jonasova, Kristyna
    Holland, Linda Z.
    Pestarino, Mario
    Benes, Vladimir
    Candiani, Simona
    [J]. DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2007, 306 (01) : 143 - 159
  • [32] Interactions of Eph-related receptors and ligands confer rostrocaudal pattern to trunk neural crest migration
    Krull, CE
    Lansford, R
    Gale, NW
    Collazo, A
    Marcelle, C
    Yancopoulos, GD
    Fraser, SE
    BronnerFraser, M
    [J]. CURRENT BIOLOGY, 1997, 7 (08) : 571 - 580
  • [33] Kuratani S, 1998, J COMP NEUROL, V391, P99
  • [34] Developmental morphology of branchiomeric nerves in a cat shark, Scyliorhinus torazame, with special reference to rhombomeres, cephalic mesoderm, and distribution patterns of cephalic crest cells
    Kuratani, S
    Horigome, N
    [J]. ZOOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2000, 17 (07) : 893 - 909
  • [35] THE CELLULAR BASIS OF SEGMENTATION IN THE DEVELOPING HINDBRAIN
    LUMSDEN, A
    [J]. TRENDS IN NEUROSCIENCES, 1990, 13 (08) : 329 - 335
  • [36] SEGMENTAL PATTERNS OF NEURONAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE CHICK HINDBRAIN
    LUMSDEN, A
    KEYNES, R
    [J]. NATURE, 1989, 337 (6206) : 424 - 428
  • [37] LUMSDEN A, 1991, DEVELOPMENT, V113, P1281
  • [38] Retinoic acid in the development, regeneration and maintenance of the nervous system
    Maden, Malcolm
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE, 2007, 8 (10) : 755 - 765
  • [39] Developmental expression of the amphioxus Tbx1/10 gene illuminates the evolution of vertebrate branchial arches and sclerotome
    Mahadevan, NR
    Horton, AC
    Gibson-Brown, JJ
    [J]. DEVELOPMENT GENES AND EVOLUTION, 2004, 214 (11) : 559 - 566
  • [40] Somitogenesis
    Maroto, Miguel
    Bone, Robert A.
    Dale, J. Kim
    [J]. DEVELOPMENT, 2012, 139 (14): : 2453 - 2456