Eddy current compensated double diffusion encoded (DDE) MRI

被引:10
作者
Mueller, Lars [1 ]
Wetscherek, Andreas [1 ]
Kuder, Tristan Anselm [1 ]
Laun, Frederik Bernd [1 ]
机构
[1] German Canc Res Ctr, Med Phys Radiol, Heidelberg, Germany
关键词
microscopic diffusion anisotropy; FA; double diffusion encoding; eddy current compensation; MRI; PULSED-FIELD-GRADIENT; COMPARTMENT SHAPE ANISOTROPY; REFOCUSED SPIN-ECHO; MAGNETIC-FIELD; HUMAN BRAIN; IN-VIVO; ENSEMBLE ANISOTROPY; SIZE ESTIMATION; TENSOR MRI; PGSE NMR;
D O I
10.1002/mrm.26092
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PurposeEddy currents might lead to image distortions in diffusion-weighted echo planar imaging. A method is proposed to reduce their effects on double diffusion encoding (DDE) MRI experiments and the thereby derived microscopic fractional anisotropy (FA). MethodsThe twice-refocused spin echo scheme was adapted for DDE measurements. To assess the effect of individual diffusion encodings on the image distortions, measurements of a grid of plastic rods in water were performed. The effect of eddy current compensation on FA measurements was evaluated in the brains of six healthy volunteers. ResultsThe use of an eddy current compensation reduced the signal variation. As expected, the distortions caused by the second encoding were larger than those of the first encoding, entailing a stronger need to compensate for them. For an optimal result, however, both encodings had to be compensated. The artifact reduction strongly improved the measurement of the FA in ventricles and gray matter by reducing the overestimation. An effect of the compensation on absolute FA values in white matter was not observed. ConclusionIt is advisable to compensate both encodings in DDE measurements for eddy currents. Magn Reson Med 77:328-335, 2017. (c) 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:328 / 335
页数:8
相关论文
共 56 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2014, NMR BIOMED, V27, P738
  • [2] In vivo detection of microscopic anisotropy using quadruple pulsed-field gradient (qPFG) diffusion MRI on a clinical scanner
    Avram, Alexandru V.
    Oezarslan, Evren
    Sarlls, Joelle E.
    Basser, Peter J.
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2013, 64 : 229 - 239
  • [3] MR DIFFUSION TENSOR SPECTROSCOPY AND IMAGING
    BASSER, PJ
    MATTIELLO, J
    LEBIHAN, D
    [J]. BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1994, 66 (01) : 259 - 267
  • [4] Diffusion-tensor MRI: theory, experimental design and data analysis - a technical review
    Basser, PJ
    Jones, DK
    [J]. NMR IN BIOMEDICINE, 2002, 15 (7-8) : 456 - 467
  • [5] Concomitant gradient terms in phase contrast MR: Analysis and correction
    Bernstein, MA
    Zhou, XHJ
    Polzin, JA
    King, KF
    Ganin, A
    Pelc, NJ
    Glover, GH
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1998, 39 (02) : 300 - 308
  • [6] Eddy current correction in diffusion-weighted imaging using pairs of images acquired with opposite diffusion gradient polarity
    Bodammer, N
    Kaufmann, J
    Kanowski, M
    Tempelmann, C
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2004, 51 (01) : 188 - 193
  • [7] Callaghan P.T, 2006, Principles of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Microscopy
  • [8] Characterization and correction of eddy-current artifacts in unipolar and bipolar diffusion sequences using magnetic field monitoring
    Chan, Rachel W.
    von Deuster, Constantin
    Giese, Daniel
    Stoeck, Christian T.
    Harmer, Jack
    Aitken, Andrew P.
    Atkinson, David
    Kozerke, Sebastian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 2014, 244 : 74 - 84
  • [9] Multiple scattering by NMR
    Cheng, Y
    Cory, DG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1999, 121 (34) : 7935 - 7936
  • [10] Isotropic diffusion weighting in PGSE NMR by magic-angle spinning of the q-vector
    Eriksson, Stefanie
    Lasic, Samo
    Topgaard, Daniel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 2013, 226 : 13 - 18