Tensions and Paradoxes in Creativity and Innovation

被引:4
作者
Potocnik, Kristina [1 ]
Verwaeren, Bart
Nijstad, Bernard
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
来源
JOURNAL OF WORK AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY-REVISTA DE PSICOLOGIA DEL TRABAJO Y DE LAS ORGANIZACIONES | 2022年 / 38卷 / 03期
关键词
Creativity; Innovation; Tensions; Paradoxes; Competing demands; TASK CONFLICT; TEAM CREATIVITY; IDEA GENERATION; DUAL PATHWAY; TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP; WORKPLACE CREATIVITY; PSYCHOLOGICAL SAFETY; EMPLOYEE CREATIVITY; PERSPECTIVE-TAKING; INTEGRATIVE MODEL;
D O I
10.5093/jwop2022a19
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Most often understood as the generation of novel and useful ideas and their implementation, research on creativity and innovation has mushroomed in recent years. Although these studies provided useful insights into how organizations can enhance both phenomena, there is a growing consensus in the literature suggesting that rather than inherently beneficial, creativity and innovation are in fact ripe with tensions and competing demands. These tensions may put individuals and teams under pressure as they try to a) come up with novel, but also useful and implementable ideas, b) complete their core tasks efficiently, but also suggest novel and useful ideas for their improvement, and c) bring uniqueness to the table, but at the same time form cohesive collectives. In this integrative review, we illustrate these tensions with research evidence and provide recommendations about how we can manage them in order to benefit from individual and team creative and innovative efforts.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 163
页数:15
相关论文
共 148 条
  • [1] Creativity and Innovation Under Constraints: A Cross-Disciplinary Integrative Review
    Acar, Oguz A.
    Tarakci, Murat
    van Knippenberg, Daan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2019, 45 (01) : 96 - 121
  • [2] Differentiating selves facilitates group outcomes
    Ainsworth, Sarah E.
    Baumeister, Roy F.
    Vohsc, Kathleen D.
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 2016, 39 : e167
  • [3] The dynamic componential model of creativity and innovation in organizations: Making progress, making meaning
    Amabile, Teresa M.
    Pratt, Michael G.
    [J]. RESEARCH IN ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR: AN ANNUAL SERIES OF ANALYTICAL ESSAYS AND CRITICAL REVIEWS, VOL 36, 2016, 36 : 157 - 183
  • [4] AMABILE TM, 1988, RES ORGAN BEHAV, V10, P123
  • [6] Amabile TM., 1996, CREATIVITY CONTEXT U
  • [7] The routinization of innovation research: a constructively critical review of the state-of-the-science
    Anderson, N
    De Dreu, CKW
    Nijstad, BA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2004, 25 (02) : 147 - 173
  • [8] Innovation and Creativity in Organizations: A State-of-the-Science Review, Prospective Commentary, and Guiding Framework
    Anderson, Neil
    Potocnik, Kristina
    Zhou, Jing
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2014, 40 (05) : 1297 - 1333
  • [9] Baas M., 2015, COGNITIVE EMOTIONAL, DOI [10.3389/978-2-88919-633-3, DOI 10.3389/978-2-88919-633-3]
  • [10] A Meta-Analysis of 25 Years of Mood-Creativity Research: Hedonic Tone, Activation, or Regulatory Focus?
    Baas, Matthijs
    De Dreu, Carsten K. W.
    Nijstad, Bernard A.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2008, 134 (06) : 779 - 806