Agronomy research co-authorship networks in agricultural innovation systems

被引:6
作者
Romero-Riano, Efren [1 ,2 ]
Dario Guerrero-Santander, Cesar [3 ]
Ernesto Martinez-Ardila, Hugo [4 ]
机构
[1] Innotec, Bogota, Colombia
[2] Univ Autonoma Bucaramanga, Ingn, Bucaramanga, Colombia
[3] Univ Autonoma Bucaramanga, Grp Tecnol Informac, Direcc Invest, Bucaramanga, Colombia
[4] Univ Ind Santander, Escuela Estudios Ind & Empresariales, Innotec, Bucaramanga, Colombia
来源
UIS INGENIERIAS | 2021年 / 20卷 / 01期
关键词
agricultural innovation systems; collaboration; social network analysis; bibliometrics; coauthorship; scientific visualization; VOS viewer; UCINET; COLLABORATION; PROGRAMS;
D O I
10.18273/revuin.v20n1-2021015
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Increasingly, Agricultural Innovation Systems, AIS, have been recognized as fundamentals pathways for agricultural science impact. This new thinking focuses on innovation, not as the end of pipe outcome of knowledge transfer, but as a continuous process of social, technical and scientific collaboration at regional and higherlevel systems that impacts on productivity and innovation performance. This paper surveys the agricultural innovation system in Colombia. We analyze collaboration between authors, institutions and countries from the perspective of social network analysis to introduce a descriptive review of the scientific collaboration in terms of links (discipline structure) and nodes (actors). A mixed methodology is implemented based on co-authorship bibliometric mapping using VOS VIEWER and social network analysis based on the software UCINET. Whereas exogenous authors and institutions are the most connected in terms of interaction, they have lower influence than endogenous authors.
引用
收藏
页码:161 / 175
页数:15
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]   Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge [J].
Acs, ZJ ;
Anselin, L ;
Varga, A .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2002, 31 (07) :1069-1085
[2]  
Adejuwon O.O., 2016, Innovation and Development, V6, P175, DOI DOI 10.1080/2157930X.2016.1195089
[3]  
Valencia-Arias JA, 2019, ESTUD GERENC, V35, P219, DOI [10.18046/-j.estger.2019.151.3277, 10.18046/j.estger.2019.151.3277]
[4]   FRAMEWORKS TO IDENTIFY BEST PRACTICES AT THE ORGANIZATION LEVEL: AN ANALYSIS [J].
Angulo Cuentas, Gerardo Luis ;
Camacho Pico, Jaime Alberto ;
Jaime Arias, Astrid .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2015, 16 (04) :861-875
[5]  
Barry P., 2017, Agricultural Systems, P371, DOI [10.1016/B978-0-12-802070-8.00011-6, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-802070-8.00011-6]
[6]  
Beltran A.M., 2020, Prisma Social, V30, P161
[7]  
Borgatti J. C., 2013, ANAL SOCIAL NETWORKS, V136
[8]  
Borgatti L. C., 2002, UCINET 6 WINDOWS SOF
[9]   The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology [J].
Borgatti, SP ;
Foster, PC .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2003, 29 (06) :991-1013
[10]   On Network Theory [J].
Borgatti, Stephen P. ;
Halgin, Daniel S. .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2011, 22 (05) :1168-1181