Effectiveness of the psychological and pharmacological treatment of catastrophization in patients with fibromyalgia: a randomized controlled trial

被引:19
作者
Garcia-Campayo, Javier [1 ,7 ]
Serrano-Blanco, Antoni [2 ]
Rodero, Baltasar [3 ]
Magallon, Rosa [4 ,7 ]
Alda, Marta [5 ,7 ]
Andres, Eva [6 ,7 ]
Luciano, Juan V. [2 ]
Lopez del Hoyo, Yolanda [1 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zaragoza, E-50009 Zaragoza, Spain
[2] Fdn St Joan de Deu, St Joan de Deu Serv Salud Mental, Barcelona, Spain
[3] Clin Neurociencias, Ctr Rodero, Santander, Spain
[4] Ctr Salud Arrabal, Zaragoza, Spain
[5] Hosp Alcaniz, Serv Psiquiatria, Teruel, Spain
[6] Statistician Univ Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
[7] IACS, Grp Aragnoes Invest Atenc Primaria Red Actividade, Aragon, Spain
关键词
BACK-PAIN PATIENTS; SPANISH VERSION; COGNITIVE STRATEGIES; IMPACT QUESTIONNAIRE; REGRESSION-MODELS; VALIDATION; SCALE; DISABILITY; BEHAVIOR; GENDER;
D O I
10.1186/1745-6215-10-24
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: Fibromyalgia is a prevalent and disabling disorder characterized by widespread pain and other symptoms such as insomnia, fatigue or depression. Catastrophization is considered a key clinical symptom in fibromyalgia; however, there are no studies on the pharmacological or psychological treatment of catastrophizing. The general aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness of cognitive-behaviour therapy and recommended pharmacological treatment for fibromyalgia (pregabalin, with duloxetine added where there is a comorbid depression), compared with usual treatment at primary care level. Method/design: Design: A multi-centre, randomized controlled trial involving three groups: the control group, consisting of usual treatment at primary care level, and two intervention groups, one consisting of cognitive-behaviour therapy, and the other consisting of the recommended pharmacological treatment for fibromyalgia. Setting: 29 primary care health centres in the city of Zaragoza, Spain. Sample: 180 patients, aged 18-65 years, able to understand and read Spanish, who fulfil criteria for primary fibromyalgia, with no previous psychological treatment, and no pharmacological treatment or their acceptance to discontinue it two weeks before the onset of the study. Intervention: Psychological treatment is based on the manualized protocol developed by Prof. Escobar et al, from the University of New Jersey, for the treatment of somatoform disorders, which has been adapted by our group for the treatment of fibromyalgia. It includes 10 weekly sessions of cognitive-behaviour therapy. Pharmacological therapy consists of the recommended pharmacological treatment for fibromyalgia: pregabalin (300-600 mg/day), with duloxetine (60-120 mg/day) added where there is a comorbid depression). Measurements: The following socio-demographic data will be collected: sex, age, marital status, education, occupation and social class. The diagnosis of psychiatric disorders will be made with the Structured Polyvalent Psychiatric Interview. Other instruments to be administered are the Pain Catastrophizing Scale, the Hamilton tests for Anxiety and for Depression, the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ), the EuroQuol-5 domains (EQ-5D), and the use of health and social services (CSRI). Assessments will be carried out at baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months. Main variable: Pain catastrophizing. Analysis: The analysis will be per intent to treat. We will use the general linear models of the SPSS version 15 statistical package, to analyse the effect of the treatment on the result variable (pain catastrophizing). Discussion: It is necessary to assess the effectiveness of pharmacological and psychological treatments for pain catastrophizing in fibromyalgia. This randomized clinical trial will determine whether both treatments are effective for this important prognostic variable in patients with fibromyalgia.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
Armitage P., STAT METHODS MED RES
[2]   A comparison of several regression models for analysing cost of CABG surgery [J].
Austin, PC ;
Ghali, WA ;
Tu, JV .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2003, 22 (17) :2799-2815
[3]  
Badia X, 1999, MED CLIN-BARCELONA, V112, P79
[4]  
Bedard G.B. V., 1997, Pain Research Management, V2, P151
[5]   Catastrophizing and pain-coping in young adults: Associations with depressive symptoms and headache pain [J].
Buenaver, Luis F. ;
Edwards, Robert R. ;
Smith, Michael T. ;
Gramling, Sandra E. ;
Haythornthwaite, Jennifer A. .
JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2008, 9 (04) :311-319
[6]   Pain-related catastrophizing and perceived social responses: Inter-relationships in the context of chronic pain [J].
Buenaver, Luis F. ;
Edwards, Robert R. ;
Haythornthwaite, Jennifer A. .
PAIN, 2007, 127 (03) :234-242
[7]  
BURCKHARDT CS, 1991, J RHEUMATOL, V18, P728
[8]   PSYCHOSOCIAL PREDICTORS OF OUTCOME IN ACUTE AND SUBCHRONIC LOW-BACK TROUBLE [J].
BURTON, AK ;
TILLOTSON, KM ;
MAIN, CJ ;
HOLLIS, S .
SPINE, 1995, 20 (06) :722-728
[9]   SPONTANEOUS COGNITIVE STRATEGIES FOR THE CONTROL OF CLINICAL PAIN AND STRESS [J].
CHAVES, JF ;
BROWN, JM .
JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 1987, 10 (03) :263-276
[10]   A comparison of multivariable regression models to analyse cost data [J].
Dodd, S ;
Bassi, A ;
Bodger, K ;
Williamson, P .
JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2006, 12 (01) :76-86