Proofs of proximity for context-free languages and read-once branching programs

被引:1
作者
Goldreich, Oded [1 ]
Gur, Tom [2 ]
Rothblum, Ron D. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Weizmann Inst Sci, Rehovot, Israel
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[3] MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[4] Northeastern Univ, Boston, MA 02115 USA
基金
以色列科学基金会;
关键词
Property testing; Probabilistic proof systems; Interactive proofs;
D O I
10.1016/j.ic.2018.02.003
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
Proofs of proximity are proof systems wherein the verifier queries a sublinear number of bits, and soundness only asserts that inputs that are far from valid will be rejected. In their minimal form, called MA proofs of proximity (MAP), the verifier receives, in addition to query access to the input, also free access to a short (sublinear) proof. A more general notion is that of interactive proofs of proximity (IPP), wherein the verifier is allowed to interact with an omniscient, yet untrusted prover. We construct proofs of proximity for two natural classes of properties: (1) context-free languages, and (2) languages accepted by small read-once branching programs. Our main results are: 1. MAPs for these two classes, in which, for inputs of length n, both the verifier's query complexity and the length of the MAPproof are (O) over tilde (root n). 2. IPPs for the same two classes with constant query complexity, poly-logarithmic communication complexity, and logarithmically many rounds of interaction. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:175 / 201
页数:27
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Regular languages are testable with a constant number of queries
    Alon, N
    Krivelevich, M
    Newman, I
    Szegedy, M
    [J]. SIAM JOURNAL ON COMPUTING, 2001, 30 (06) : 1842 - 1862
  • [2] Robust PCPs of proximity, shorter PCPs, and applications to coding
    Ben-Sasson, Eli
    Goldreich, Oded
    Harsha, Prahladh
    Sudan, Madhu
    Vadhan, Salil
    [J]. SIAM JOURNAL ON COMPUTING, 2006, 36 (04) : 889 - 974
  • [3] Bollig B, 2005, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V3623, P258, DOI 10.1007/11537311_23
  • [4] Cook S. A., 1971, Proceedings of the 3rd annual ACM symposium on theory of computing, P151
  • [5] Assignment testers: Towards a combinatorial proof of the PCP theorem
    Dinur, Irit
    Reingold, Omer
    [J]. SIAM JOURNAL ON COMPUTING, 2006, 36 (04) : 975 - 1024
  • [6] Fast approximate probabilistically checkable proofs
    Ergün, F
    Kumar, R
    Rubinfeld, R
    [J]. INFORMATION AND COMPUTATION, 2004, 189 (02) : 135 - 159
  • [7] Fischer Eldar., 2014, Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science, ITCS'14, Princeton, NJ, USA, January 12-14, 2014, P483, DOI DOI 10.1145/2554797.2554841
  • [8] 2 FAMILIES OF LANGUAGES RELATED TO ALGOL
    GINSBURG, S
    RICE, HG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ACM, 1962, 9 (03) : 350 - +
  • [9] Goldreich Oded, 2012, Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques. Proceedings 15th International Workshop, APPROX 2012 and 16th International Workshop, RANDOM 2012, P565, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-32512-0_48
  • [10] Property testing and its connection to learning and approximation
    Goldreich, O
    Goldwasser, S
    Ron, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ACM, 1998, 45 (04) : 653 - 750