Managing the grand challenge of biological threats to food production: The importance of institutional logics for managing Australian biosecurity
被引:10
|
作者:
Bryant, Melanie
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Tasmania, Tasmanian Sch Business & Econ, Private Bag 84,Centenary Bldg, Hobart, Tas 7001, AustraliaUniv Tasmania, Tasmanian Sch Business & Econ, Private Bag 84,Centenary Bldg, Hobart, Tas 7001, Australia
Bryant, Melanie
[1
]
Higgins, Vaughan
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Tasmania, Sch Social Sci, Launceston, Tas, AustraliaUniv Tasmania, Tasmanian Sch Business & Econ, Private Bag 84,Centenary Bldg, Hobart, Tas 7001, Australia
Higgins, Vaughan
[2
]
机构:
[1] Univ Tasmania, Tasmanian Sch Business & Econ, Private Bag 84,Centenary Bldg, Hobart, Tas 7001, Australia
[2] Univ Tasmania, Sch Social Sci, Launceston, Tas, Australia
Australian agriculture;
biosecurity;
grand challenges;
institutional logics;
shared responsibility;
DISEASE RISK;
ORGANIZATIONS;
COMPLEXITY;
MANAGEMENT;
PERSPECTIVES;
CONTINGENCY;
RESPONSES;
INDUSTRY;
HEALTH;
IMPACT;
D O I:
10.1177/0312896219867997
中图分类号:
F [经济];
学科分类号:
02 ;
摘要:
This article argues that an institutional logics framework is critical for developing a shared responsibility approach to managing the grand challenge of biosecurity in Australian agriculture. We identify the dominant logics evident in the Australian biosecurity context. In doing so, we draw attention to how a shared responsibility approach is compromised by tensions created by multiple logics, such as varying interpretations of biosecurity roles and responsibilities that different actors hold. However, in reframing such tensions from an institutional ambidexterity framework, we argue that a shared responsibility approach is achievable and, through examples from the Australian context, highlight the sites and spaces through which it may be fostered. We argue that identifying these sites and spaces requires that scholars conceptualise logics as blended rather than as discrete modes of operation. JEL Classification: M19