Diagnostic Efficiency of Gynecologic Imaging Reporting and Data System Combined With 3-dimensional Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound Scoring System in Evaluating Ovarian Tumor

被引:8
|
作者
Yang, Lin [1 ]
Lv, Guorong [2 ]
Chen, Huie [1 ]
Yang, Shuping [1 ]
Liao, Jianmei [1 ]
Zhang, Weina [1 ]
Ke, Linfang [1 ]
机构
[1] Fujian Med Univ, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hosp, Dept Ultrasound, Zhangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Quanzhou Med Coll, Dept Clin Med, Quanzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
GI-RADS; 3D-CEUS; ovarian tumor; CARCINOMA; EXPRESSION; MRI;
D O I
10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000524
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
To estimate the value of gynecologic imaging reporting and data system (GI-RADS) combined with 3-dimensional contrast-enhanced ultrasound (3D-CEUS) scoring system in the differential diagnosis of ovarian tumor. Both of 2-dimensional ultrasound (2D-US) and 3D-CEUS were performed on 114 patients with ovarian masses by Voluson E8 with SonoVue (Bracco, Italy). Besides, dynamic contrast-enhanced-magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) (Siemens Magneton Verio 3.0T, Germany) was performed on the patients. There were totally 62 benign and 52 malignant ovarian tumors in all patients. The ability of GI-RADS combined with 3D-CEUS scoring system to distinguish benign and malignant ovarian tumors was superior to conventional ultrasound GI-RADS classification. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of GI-RADS combined with 3D-CEUS scoring system were 96.2% and 98.1%, 87.10%, whereas those of MRI were 87.10%, 91.23%, and 92.11% respectively, indicating that there was high concordance in ovarian tumors assessment between the 2 diagnostic methods. The new scoring system has a good correlation with microvessel density (P = 0.000, r = 0.73), estrogen receptor (P = 0.000, r = 0.59), progesterone receptor (P = 0.000, r = 0.56), and matrix metalloproteinase-9 (P = 0.000, r = 0.61). The GI-RADS combined with 3D-CEUS scoring system was valuable in clinical diagnosis and differential diagnosis of ovarian tumor and show good agreement with MRI.
引用
收藏
页码:375 / 381
页数:7
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] The correlation between contrast-enhanced ultrasound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System classification and differentiation grades of combined hepatocellular carcinomacholangiocarcinoma
    Yang, Jingwen
    Cao, Jiazhi
    Ruan, Xiaomiao
    Ren, Youxiang
    Ling, Wenwu
    QUANTITATIVE IMAGING IN MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2025, 15 (01) : 259 - 271
  • [2] COMPARISON OF CONTRAST-ENHANCED ULTRASOUND VERSUS CONTRAST-ENHANCED MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF FOCAL LIVER LESIONS USING THE LIVER IMAGING REPORTING AND DATA SYSTEM
    Wang, Jia-Yu
    Feng, Shao-Yang
    Yi, Ai-Jiao
    Zhu, Di
    Xu, Jian-Wei
    Li, Jun
    Cui, Xin-Wu
    Dietrich, Christoph F.
    ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2020, 46 (05) : 1216 - 1223
  • [3] Combined contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance and diffusion-weighted imaging reading adapted to the "Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System" for multiparametric 3-T imaging of breast lesions
    Pinker, K.
    Bickel, H.
    Helbich, T. H.
    Gruber, S.
    Dubsky, P.
    Pluschnig, U.
    Rudas, M.
    Bago-Horvath, Z.
    Weber, M.
    Trattnig, S.
    Bogner, W.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2013, 23 (07) : 1791 - 1802
  • [4] Contrast-enhanced ultrasound liver imaging reporting and data system: clinical validation in a prospective multinational study in North America and Europe
    Lyshchik, Andrej
    Wessner, Corinne E.
    Bradigan, Kristen
    Eisenbrey, John R.
    Forsberg, Flemming
    Yi, Misung
    Keith, Scott W.
    Kono, Yuko
    Wilson, Stephanie R.
    Medellin, Alexandra
    Rodgers, Shuchi K.
    Planz, Virginia
    Kamaya, Aya
    Finch, Lisa
    Fetzer, David T.
    Berzigotti, Annalisa
    Sidhu, Paul S.
    Piscaglia, Fabio
    HEPATOLOGY, 2024, 79 (02) : 380 - 391
  • [5] Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) 2017 - a review of important differences compared to the CT/MRI system
    Kim, Tae Kyoung
    Noh, Seung Yeon
    Wilson, Stephanie R.
    Kono, Yuko
    Piscaglia, Fabio
    Jang, Hyun-Jung
    Lyshchik, Andrej
    Dietrich, Christoph F.
    Willmann, Juergen K.
    Vezeridis, Alexander
    Sirlin, Claude B.
    CLINICAL AND MOLECULAR HEPATOLOGY, 2017, 23 (04) : 280 - 289
  • [6] Combined contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance and diffusion-weighted imaging reading adapted to the “Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System” for multiparametric 3-T imaging of breast lesions
    K. Pinker
    H. Bickel
    T. H. Helbich
    S. Gruber
    P. Dubsky
    U. Pluschnig
    M. Rudas
    Z. Bago-Horvath
    M. Weber
    S. Trattnig
    W. Bogner
    European Radiology, 2013, 23 : 1791 - 1802
  • [7] COMPARISON OF THE DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF PERCUTANEOUS FISTULA CONTRAST-ENHANCED ULTRASOUND COMBINED WITH TRANSRECTAL 360° 3-D IMAGING AND CONVENTIONAL TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND IN COMPLEX ANAL FISTULA
    Gou, B. O.
    Zhang, Ji-Cheng
    Chen, Lin
    Xin, Feng-Yue
    Zhou, Jiang-Ying
    Xu, Qin-Mei
    Liu, Jian
    ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2022, 48 (10) : 2154 - 2161
  • [8] Utility of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System v2018 Ancillary Features for the Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in LR-4 Lesions Using Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Lim, K.
    Kwon, H.
    Cho, J.
    Kim, D.
    Kim, S.
    Kang, E.
    HONG KONG JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 25 (02): : 84 - 93
  • [9] Change in Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System Characterization of Focal Liver Lesions Using Gadoxetate Disodium Magnetic Resonance Imaging Compared With Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography
    Hope, Thomas A.
    Aslam, Rizwan
    Weinstein, Stefanie
    Yeh, Benjamin M.
    Corvera, Carlos U.
    Monto, Alex
    Yee, Judy
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2017, 41 (03) : 376 - 381
  • [10] The efficacy of modified contrast-enhanced ultrasound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (CEUS LI-RADS) using Sonazoid in diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Liu, Qianyu
    Liu, Ting
    Liu, Xiang
    Zhang, Feng
    Yang, Jinyu
    Cheng, Yanan
    Yang, Qing
    QUANTITATIVE IMAGING IN MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2024, 14 (04) : 2927 - 2937