Hemodynamic Monitoring for the Evaluation and Treatment of Shock: What Is the Current State of the Art?

被引:18
作者
Suess, Eric M. [1 ]
Pinsky, Michael R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Crit Care Med, 606 Scaife Hall,3550 Terrace St, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA
关键词
functional hemodynamic monitoring; shock; minimally invasive monitoring; goal-directed therapy; volume responsiveness; CENTRAL VENOUS-PRESSURE; PREDICT FLUID RESPONSIVENESS; RIGHT-HEART CATHETERIZATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; END-EXPIRATORY OCCLUSION; TISSUE OXYGEN-SATURATION; CRITICALLY-ILL PATIENTS; VENA-CAVA DIAMETER; SEPTIC SHOCK; PULSE PRESSURE;
D O I
10.1055/s-0035-1564874
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Hemodynamic monitoring has become a fundamental and ubiquitous, if not defining, aspect of critical care medicine practice. Modern monitoring techniques have changed significantly over the past few years and are now able to rapidly identify shock states earlier, define the etiology, and monitor the response to therapies. Many of these techniques are now minimally invasive or noninvasive. Basic hemodynamic monitoring and evaluation usually includes a focused physical examination and static hemodynamic vital signs: temperature, heart rate, respiratory rate, mean arterial pressure, and arterial hemoglobin oxygen saturation, typically measured with pulse photoplethysmography. When available, measurement of urinary output is often included. Advanced hemodynamic monitoring incorporates both noninvasive and invasive continuous hemodynamic monitoring. Noninvasive ultrasound has emerged as a fundamental hemodynamic evaluation tool and its use is now rapidly increasing. Invasive monitoring from arterial and central venous catheters, and occasionally pulmonary artery catheters, provides measurement of arterial pressure, intracardiac filling pressures, arterial and venous blood gases, and cardiac index. Minimally invasive and noninvasive measure of arterial pressure and cardiac output are also possible and often remain as accurate as invasive measures. Importantly, such advanced monitoring provides the foundation for goal-directed therapies for the treatment of shock. When coupled with functional hemodynamic monitoring analyses, these measures markedly extend the diagnostic and therapeutic potential of all monitoring modalities by defining preload reserve, vasomotor tone, cardiac performance, and tissue perfusion.
引用
收藏
页码:890 / 898
页数:9
相关论文
共 104 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2014, NEW ENGL J MED, DOI DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa1401602
  • [2] High versus Low Blood-Pressure Target in Patients with Septic Shock
    Asfar, Pierre
    Meziani, Ferhat
    Hamel, Jean-Francois
    Grelon, Fabien
    Megarbane, Bruno
    Anguel, Nadia
    Mira, Jean-Paul
    Dequin, Pierre-Francois
    Gergaud, Soizic
    Weiss, Nicolas
    Legay, Francois
    Le Tulzo, Yves
    Conrad, Marie
    Robert, Rene
    Gonzalez, Frederic
    Guitton, Christophe
    Tamion, Fabienne
    Tonnelier, Jean-Marie
    Guezennec, Pierre
    Van der Linden, Thierry
    Vieillard-Baron, Antoine
    Mariotte, Eric
    Pradel, Gael
    Lesieur, Olivier
    Ricard, Jean-Damien
    Herve, Fabien
    du Cheyron, Damien
    Guerin, Claude
    Mercat, Alain
    Teboul, Jean-Louis
    Radermacher, Peter
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2014, 370 (17) : 1583 - 1593
  • [3] Timing of vasopressor initiation and mortality in septic shock: a cohort study
    Beck, Vance
    Chateau, Dan
    Bryson, Gregory L.
    Pisipati, Amarnath
    Zanotti, Sergio
    Parrillo, Joseph E.
    Kumar, Anand
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE, 2014, 18 (03)
  • [4] Clinical review: Clinical imaging of the sublingual microcirculation in the critically ill - where do we stand?
    Bezemer, Rick
    Bartels, Sebastiaan A.
    Bakker, Jan
    Ince, Can
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE, 2012, 16 (03):
  • [5] Changes in stroke volume induced by passive leg raising in spontaneously breathing patients: comparison between echocardiography and Vigileo™/FloTrac™ device
    Biais, Matthieu
    Vidil, Lionel
    Sarrabay, Philippe
    Cottenceau, Vincent
    Revel, Philippe
    Sztark, Francois
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE, 2009, 13 (06): : R195
  • [6] Respiratory variation in inferior vena cava diameter: surrogate of central venous pressure or parameter of fluid responsiveness? Let the physiology reply
    Bodson, Laurent
    Vieillard-Baron, Antoine
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE, 2012, 16 (06):
  • [7] The Interface Between Monitoring and Physiology at the Bedside
    Bose, Eliezer L.
    Hravnak, Marilyn
    Pinsky, Michael R.
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE CLINICS, 2015, 31 (01) : 1 - +
  • [8] Changes in BP induced by passive leg raising predict response to fluid loading in critically ill patients
    Boulain, T
    Achard, JM
    Teboul, JL
    Richard, C
    Perrotin, D
    Ginies, G
    [J]. CHEST, 2002, 121 (04) : 1245 - 1252
  • [9] Fluid resuscitation in septic shock: A positive fluid balance and elevated central venous pressure are associated with increased mortality
    Boyd, John H.
    Forbes, Jason
    Nakada, Taka-aki
    Walley, Keith R.
    Russell, James A.
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2011, 39 (02) : 259 - 265
  • [10] A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL OF THE EFFECT OF DELIBERATE PERIOPERATIVE INCREASE OF OXYGEN DELIVERY ON MORTALITY IN HIGH-RISK SURGICAL PATIENTS
    BOYD, O
    GROUNDS, RM
    BENNETT, ED
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1993, 270 (22): : 2699 - 2707