System Level Performance Analysis for Real-Time Automotive Multicore and Network Architectures

被引:22
作者
Schliecker, Simon [1 ]
Rox, Jonas [1 ]
Negrean, Mircea [1 ]
Richter, Kai [2 ]
Jersak, Marek [2 ]
Ernst, Rolf [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Carolo Wilhelmina Braunschweig, Inst Comp & Network Engn, D-38106 Braunschweig, Germany
[2] Symtavision GmbH, D-38122 Braunschweig, Germany
关键词
Automotive; end-to-end timing; multicore; real time; shared resources;
D O I
10.1109/TCAD.2009.2013286
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Software timing aspects have only recently received broad attention in the automotive industry. New design trends and the ongoing work in the AUTOSAR (Automotive Open System Architecture) partnership have significantly increased the industry's awareness to these issues. Now, timing is recognized as a major challenge and has been put explicitly on the agenda of AUTOSAR and other industry-driven research projects. The goals include complementing the existing standard by a timing view and adding methodological steps, if necessary. Clearly, establishing such timing models requires knowing well the implications of modern architectures and topologies. In this paper, we survey existing performance analysis approaches from real-time systems research and compare them to the established layered software architectures of automotive system design. We highlight key challenges for the application of performance analysis in this domain and identify structural as well as behavioral "modeling gaps". While structural gaps can be overcome by model transformations, behavioral gaps require real extensions to known analyses. We discuss two such extensions in detail, namely, the use of hierarchical event models and the specialties of timing analysis for multicore platforms. This paper concludes with an overview over qualitative comparisons of analysis techniques, both technically and concerning their industrial applicability.
引用
收藏
页码:979 / 992
页数:14
相关论文
共 48 条
[21]   Context-aware performance analysis for efficient embedded system design [J].
Jersak, M ;
Henia, R ;
Ernst, R .
DESIGN, AUTOMATION AND TEST IN EUROPE CONFERENCE AND EXHIBITION, VOLS 1 AND 2, PROCEEDINGS, 2004, :1046-1051
[22]  
JERSAK M, 2007, ELEKT AUTOM MAG SPEC
[23]  
Jonsson B., 2008, ACM INT C EMB SOFTW, P179, DOI [10.1145/1450058.1450083, DOI 10.1145/1450058.1450083]
[24]  
Künzli S, 2006, DES AUT TEST EUROPE, P234
[25]  
KUNZLI S, 2007, P 5 IEEE ACM INT C H, P63
[26]  
LEHOCZKY JP, 1990, PROCEEDINGS : 11TH REAL-TIME SYSTEMS SYMPOSIUM, P201, DOI 10.1109/REAL.1990.128748
[27]   Workload characterization model for tasks with variable execution demand [J].
Maxiaguine, A ;
Künzli, S ;
Thiele, L .
DESIGN, AUTOMATION AND TEST IN EUROPE CONFERENCE AND EXHIBITION, VOLS 1 AND 2, PROCEEDINGS, 2004, :1040-1045
[28]  
*OSEK VDX CONS, 2005, OSEK VDX OP SYST V 2
[29]  
*OSEK VDX CONS, 2004, OSEK VDX COMM V 3 0
[30]  
PERATHONER S, 2008, DESIGN AUTOM EMB APR