The Effect of Topical Ocular Anesthetic Proparacaine on Conjunctival and Nasal Mucosal Flora in Dry Eye Disease Patients

被引:10
作者
Celebi, Ozlem Onerci [1 ]
Celebi, Ali Riza Cenk [2 ]
机构
[1] Eregli State Hosp, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, TorosMah Yurt Cad 13, TR-42000 Eregli, Konya, Turkey
[2] Acibadem Univ, Atakent Educ & Res Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Sch Med, TurgutOzalBlvrd 16, TR-34303 Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
anesthetic; antibacterial; conjunctival flora; nasal mucosal flora; dry eye; proparacaine; ANTIBACTERIAL ACTIVITY; BACTERIAL-FLORA; COMMENSAL;
D O I
10.3390/jcm7040073
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of topically applied ocular anesthetic proparacaine on conjunctival and nasal bacterial mucosal flora in patients with dry eye disease. A Schirmer test was done with (group 1) and without (group 2) topical anesthetic proparacaine to 40 patients in each group. Conjunctival and nasal cultures were obtained before and 10 min after performing the Schirmer test. The bacterial culture results and the isolated bacteria were recorded in two groups. Patients' mean age was 62 years (70 female, 10 male). Before the application of topical anesthetic, 50 (62.5%) and 62 (77.5%) had positive conjunctival and nasal culture, respectively, with the most commonly isolated organism being coagulase-negative Staphylococcus in each group. In group 1 the conjunctival bacterial culture positivity rate decreased from 26 (65%) to six (15%) eyes (p < 0.001); however, this rate decreased slightly from 24 (60%) to 20 (50%) eyes in group 2 (p > 0.05). For the nasal cultures, the bacterial culture positivity rate decreased from 80% to 20% and from 75% to 65% in groups 1 (p < 0.001) and 2 (p > 0.05), respectively. Topical ocular anesthetic proparacaine has antibacterial activity in both conjunctival and nasal flora in patients with dry eye disease.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles of Ocular and Nasal Flora in Patients Undergoing Intravitreal Injections
    Alabiad, Chrisfouad R.
    Miller, Darlene
    Schiffman, Joyce C.
    Davis, Janet L.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2011, 152 (06) : 999 - 1004
  • [2] Aldous W K, 1998, Ear Nose Throat J, V77, P554
  • [3] Alexandrou Terry J, 2006, Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc, V104, P196
  • [4] ANDING K, 1993, ANAESTHESIST, V42, P619
  • [5] The microbiology of the eye
    Armstrong, RA
    [J]. OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 2000, 20 (06) : 429 - 441
  • [6] Comparison of the antibacterial activity of lidocaine 1% versus alkalinized lidocaine in vitro
    Begec, Zekine
    Gulhas, Nurcin
    Toprak, H. Ilksen
    Yetkin, Gulay
    Kuzucu, Cigdern
    Ersoy, M. Ozcan
    [J]. CURRENT THERAPEUTIC RESEARCH-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, 2007, 68 (04): : 242 - 248
  • [7] Nasal commensal Staphylococcus epidermidis counteracts influenza virus
    Chen, Hui-Wen
    Liu, Pei-Feng
    Liu, Yu-Tsueng
    Kuo, Sherwin
    Zhang, Xing-Quan
    Schooley, Robert T.
    Rohde, Holger
    Gallo, Richard L.
    Huang, Chun-Ming
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2016, 6
  • [8] Changes in the Ocular and Nasal Cultures in Patients Who Had Undergone Septoplasty
    Durmaz, Evrim
    Dursun, Engin
    Iriz, Ayse
    Mumcuoglu, Ipek
    Eryilmaz, Adil
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2011, 40 (06): : 493 - 498
  • [9] Graham Joanna E, 2007, Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, V48, P5616
  • [10] Major Age Group-Specific Differences in Conjunctival Bacteria and Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance Revealed by Laboratory Data Surveillance
    Hautala, Nina
    Koskela, Markku
    Hautala, Timo
    [J]. CURRENT EYE RESEARCH, 2008, 33 (11-12) : 907 - 911