Comparative study of paper-and-pencil and electronic formats of the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale

被引：2

作者：

Montoro, Maria ^{[1
]}

Arrua-Duarte, Elsa ^{[1
,2
]}

Penalver-Argueso, Belen ^{[3
]}

Migoya-Borja, Marta ^{[4
]}

Baca-Garcia, Enrique ^{[1
,4
,5
,6
,7
,8
,9
]}

Luisa Barrigon, Maria ^{[1
,4
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Autonoma Madrid, Madrid, Spain

[2] Mentalia Salud Arevalo Avila, Arevalo, Spain

[3] Inst Salud Carlos III, Escuela Nacl Sanidad, Unidad Docente Med Prevent & Salud Publ, Madrid, Spain

[4] Univ Hosp Jimenez Diaz Fdn, Madrid, Spain

[5] Rey Juan Carlos Univ Hosp, Mostoles, Spain

[6] Gen Hosp Villalba, Madrid, Spain

[7] Infanta Elena Univ Hosp, Valdemoro, Spain

[8] Univ Catolica Maule, Talca, Chile

[9] Ctr Hosp Univ Nimes, Dept Adult Psychiat, Nimes, France

来源：

JOURNAL OF HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY | 2022年 / 27卷 / 03期

关键词：

anhedonia; depression; psychometrics; SHAPS scale; telemedicine; ECOLOGICAL MOMENTARY ASSESSMENT; ANHEDONIA; VALIDATION; SUPPORT; RECOMMENDATIONS; EQUIVALENCE; TRANSLATION; INTERNET; MHEALTH; SPANISH;

D O I：

10.1177/1359105320963552

中图分类号：

B849 [应用心理学];

学科分类号：

040203 ;

摘要：

The gold standard for measuring anhedonia is the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS). To date, there are no validated electronic versions of this questionnaire. We aim to study the equivalence between the traditional paper-and-pencil format and a digital version of the SHAPS. A group of 67 patients completed both SHAPS formats, and differences between formats were assessed. McNemar's test showed no significant differences between the two systems. The Kappa coefficient was over 40% for most items, and reliability was above 0.8, showing good to excellent levels of internal consistency. Thus, we have demonstrated a close equivalence between paper-and-pencil and electronic SHAPS.

引用

页码：557 / 567

页数：11

共 33 条

[1] Interformat Reliability of Digital Psychiatric Self-Report Questionnaires: A Systematic Review [J].