Verification of image quality and quantification in whole-body positron emission tomography with continuous bed motion

被引:5
作者
Yamamoto, Hideo [1 ]
Takemoto, Shota [1 ]
Maebatake, Akira [1 ]
Karube, Shuhei [1 ]
Yamashiro, Yuki [1 ]
Nakanishi, Atsushi [1 ]
Murakami, Koji [1 ]
机构
[1] Juntendo Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Bunkyo Ku, 3-1-3 Hongo, Tokyo 1138421, Japan
关键词
Dynamic; PET; Continuous bed motion; Quantity; Whole-body; POINT-SPREAD FUNCTION; PET QUANTIFICATION; RECONSTRUCTION; PROTOCOL; RATIOS; SHOOT; STEP;
D O I
10.1007/s12149-019-01334-z
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective Whole-body dynamic imaging using positron emission tomography (PET) facilitates the quantification of tracer kinetics. It is potentially valuable for the differential diagnosis of tumors and for the evaluation of therapeutic efficacy. In whole-body dynamic PET with continuous bed motion (CBM) (WBDCBM-PET), the pass number and bed velocity are key considerations. In the present study, we aimed to investigate the effect of a combination of pass number and bed velocity on the quantitative accuracy and quality of WBDCBM-PET images. Methods In this study, WBDCBM-PET imaging was performed at a body phantom using seven bed velocity settings in combination with pass numbers. The resulting image quality was evaluated. For comparing different acquisition settings, the dynamic index (DI) was obtained using the following formula: [P/S], where P represents the pass number, and S represents the bed velocity (mm/s). The following physical parameters were evaluated: noise equivalent count at phantom (NECphantom), percent background variability (N-10 (mm)), percent contrast of the 10 mm hot sphere (Q(H, 10) (mm)), the Q(H, 10) (mm)/N-10 (mm) ratio, and the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax). Furthermore, visual evaluation was performed. Results The NECphantom was equivalent for the same DI settings regardless of the bed velocity. The N-10 (mm) exhibited an inverse correlation (r < -0.89) with the DI. Q(H,) (10) (mm) was not affected by DI, and a correlation between Q(H,) (10) (mm)/N-10 (mm) ratio and DI was found at all the velocities (r > 0.93). The SUVmax of the spheres was not influenced by the DI. The coefficient of variations caused by bed velocity decreased in larger spheres. There was no significant difference between the bed velocities on visual evaluation. Conclusion The quantitative accuracy and image quality achieved with WBDCBM-PET was comparable to that achieved with non-dynamic CBM, regardless of the pass number and bed velocity used during imaging for a given acquisition time.
引用
收藏
页码:288 / 294
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Clinical Workflow Considerations for Implementation of Continuous-Bed-Motion PET/CT [J].
Acuff, Shelley N. ;
Osborne, Dustin .
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 44 (02) :55-58
[2]   Improvement in PET/CT Image Quality with a Combination of Point-Spread Function and Time-of-Flight in Relation to Reconstruction Parameters [J].
Akamatsu, Go ;
Ishikawa, Kaori ;
Mitsumoto, Katsuhiko ;
Taniguchi, Takafumi ;
Ohya, Nobuyoshi ;
Baba, Shingo ;
Abe, Koichiro ;
Sasaki, Masayuki .
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2012, 53 (11) :1716-1722
[3]   Generalized PSF modeling for optimized quantitation in PET imaging [J].
Ashrafinia, Saeed ;
Mohy-ud-Din, Hassan ;
Karakatsanis, Nicolas A. ;
Jha, Abhinav K. ;
Casey, Michael E. ;
Kadrmas, Dan J. ;
Rahmim, Arman .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2017, 62 (12) :5149-5179
[4]   FDG PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour imaging: version 2.0 [J].
Boellaard, Ronald ;
Delgado-Bolton, Roberto ;
Oyen, Wim J. G. ;
Giammarile, Francesco ;
Tatsch, Klaus ;
Eschner, Wolfgang ;
Verzijlbergen, Fred J. ;
Barrington, Sally F. ;
Pike, Lucy C. ;
Weber, Wolfgang A. ;
Stroobants, Sigrid ;
Delbeke, Dominique ;
Donohoe, Kevin J. ;
Holbrook, Scott ;
Graham, Michael M. ;
Testanera, Giorgio ;
Hoekstra, Otto S. ;
Zijlstra, Josee ;
Visser, Eric ;
Hoekstra, Corneline J. ;
Pruim, Jan ;
Willemsen, Antoon ;
Arends, Bertjan ;
Kotzerke, Joerg ;
Bockisch, Andreas ;
Beyer, Thomas ;
Chiti, Arturo ;
Krause, Bernd J. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2015, 42 (02) :328-354
[5]   The Netherlands protocol for standardisation and quantification of FDG whole body PET studies in multi-centre trials [J].
Boellaard, Ronald ;
Oyen, Wim J. G. ;
Hoekstra, Corneline J. ;
Hoekstra, Otto S. ;
Visser, Eric P. ;
Willemsen, Antoon T. ;
Arends, Bertjan ;
Verzijlbergen, Fred J. ;
Zijlstra, Josee ;
Paans, Anne M. ;
Comans, Emile F. I. ;
Pruim, Jan .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2008, 35 (12) :2320-2333
[6]   PET quantification with a histogram derived total activity metric: Superior quantitative consistency compared to total lesion glycolysis with absolute or relative SUV thresholds in phantoms and lung cancer patients [J].
Burger, Irene A. ;
Vargas, Hebert Alberto ;
Apte, Aditya ;
Beattie, Bradley J. ;
Humm, John L. ;
Gonen, Mithat ;
Larson, Steven M. ;
Schmidtlein, C. Ross .
NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2014, 41 (05) :410-418
[7]   Strategies to improve 3D whole-body PET image reconstruction [J].
Cutler, PD ;
Xu, M .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1996, 41 (08) :1453-1467
[8]   Multi-bed-position acquisition technique for deep inspiration breath-hold PET/CT: a preliminary result for pulmonary lesions [J].
Daisaki, Hiromitsu ;
Shinohara, Hiroyuki ;
Terauchi, Takashi ;
Murano, Takeshi ;
Shimada, Naoki ;
Moriyama, Noriyuki ;
Tateishi, Ukihide .
ANNALS OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2010, 24 (03) :179-188
[9]   Japanese guideline for the oncology FDG-PET/CT data acquisition protocol: synopsis of Version 2.0 [J].
Fukukita, Hiroyoshi ;
Suzuki, Kazufumi ;
Matsumoto, Keiichi ;
Terauchi, Takashi ;
Daisaki, Hiromitsu ;
Ikari, Yasuhiko ;
Shimada, Naoki ;
Senda, Michio .
ANNALS OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2014, 28 (07) :693-705
[10]   Time-of-Flight Information Improved the Detectability of Subcentimeter Spheres Using a Clinical PET/CT Scanner [J].
Hashimoto, Naoki ;
Morita, Keishin ;
Tsutsui, Yuji ;
Himuro, Kazuhiko ;
Baba, Shingo ;
Sasaki, Masayuki .
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 46 (03) :268-273