Measuring Acute Pain Over Time in the Critically Ill Using the Multidimensional Objective Pain Assessment Tool (MOPAT)

被引:17
作者
Wiegand, Debra L. [1 ]
Wilson, Tracey [2 ]
Pannullo, Diane [3 ]
Russo, Marguerite M. [4 ,5 ]
Kaiser, Karen Snow [6 ]
Soeken, Karen [1 ]
McGuire, Deborah B. [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Sch Nursing, 655 West Lombard St,Off 445C, Baltimore, MD 20201 USA
[2] Univ Maryland, Med Ctr, Med Intens Care Unit, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[3] Univ Maryland, Med Ctr, Surg Intens Care Unit, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[4] Univ Maryland, Med Ctr, Palliat Care, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[5] Univ Maryland Baltimore, Grad Sch, Baltimore, MD USA
[6] Univ Maryland Med Syst, Baltimore, MD USA
[7] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Sch Nursing, Richmond, VA USA
关键词
INTENSIVE-CARE-UNIT; SETTING PSYCHOMETRIC EVALUATION; AGITATION-SEDATION SCALE; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; PHYSIOLOGICAL INDICATORS; MECHANICAL VENTILATION; ADULT; VALIDATION; EXPERIENCES; PATIENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.pmn.2017.10.013
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: A valid and reliable instrument is needed to assess acute pain in critically ill patients unable to self-report and who may be transitioning between critical care and other settings. Aim: To examine the reliability, validity, and clinical utility of the Multidimensional Objective Pain Assessment Tool (MOPAT) when used over time by critical care nurses to assess acute pain in non-communicative critically ill patients. Methods: Twenty-seven patients had pain assessed at two time points (T1 and T2) surrounding a painful event for up to 3 days. Twenty-one ICU nurses participated in pain assessments and completed the Clinical Utility Questionnaire. Results: Internal consistency reliability coefficient alphas for the MOPAT were .68 at T1 and .72 at T2. Inter-rater agreement during painful procedures or turning was 68% for the behavioral dimension and 80% for the physiologic dimension. Validity was evidenced by decreases (p < .001) in the MOPAT total and behavioral and physiologic dimension scores when comparing T1 and T2. Nurses found the tool clinically useful. Conclusion: The MOPAT can be used in the critical care setting as a helpful tool to assess pain in non-communicative patients. The MOPAT is unique in that the instrument can be used over time and across settings. (C) 2017 by the American Society for Pain Management Nursing.
引用
收藏
页码:277 / 287
页数:11
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   THE MULTIDIMENSIONAL NATURE OF CANCER-RELATED PAIN [J].
AHLES, TA ;
BLANCHARD, EB ;
RUCKDESCHEL, JC .
PAIN, 1983, 17 (03) :277-288
[2]   Palliative performance scale (PPS): A new tool [J].
Anderson, F ;
Downing, GM ;
Hill, J ;
Casorso, L ;
Lerch, N .
JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE CARE, 1996, 12 (01) :5-11
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2014, IASP Taxonomy
[4]   Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Pain, Agitation, and Delirium in Adult Patients in the Intensive Care Unit [J].
Barr, Juliana ;
Fraser, Gilles L. ;
Puntillo, Kathleen ;
Ely, E. Wesley ;
Gelinas, Celine ;
Dasta, Joseph F. ;
Davidson, Judy E. ;
Devlin, John W. ;
Kress, John P. ;
Davidson, Judy E. ;
Devlin, John W. ;
Kress, John P. ;
Joffe, Aaron M. ;
Coursin, Douglas B. ;
Herr, Daniel L. ;
Tung, Avery ;
Robinson, Bryce R. H. ;
Fontaine, Dorrie K. ;
Ramsay, Michael A. ;
Riker, Richard R. ;
Sessler, Curtis N. ;
Pun, Brenda ;
Skrobik, Yoanna ;
Jaeschke, Roman .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2013, 41 (01) :263-306
[5]  
Bausell R.B., 2002, Power analysis for experimental research: a practical guide for the biological, medical and social sciences
[6]   Assessment of pain in the nonverbal or cognitively impaired older-adult [J].
Bjoro, Karen ;
Herr, Keela .
CLINICS IN GERIATRIC MEDICINE, 2008, 24 (02) :237-+
[7]  
Blakely W P, 2001, Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am, V13, P167
[8]  
Decker Sheila A, 2003, Pain Manag Nurs, V4, P77, DOI 10.1016/S1524-9042(02)54209-0
[9]   Pain during hospitalization is associated with continued pain six months later in survivors of serious illness [J].
Desbiens, NA ;
Wu, AW ;
Alzola, C ;
MuellerRizner, N ;
Wenger, NS ;
Connors, AF ;
Lynn, J ;
Phillips, RS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1997, 102 (03) :269-276
[10]   Monitoring sedation status over time in ICU patients - Reliability and validity of the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) [J].
Ely, EW ;
Truman, B ;
Shintani, A ;
Thomason, JWW ;
Wheeler, AP ;
Gordon, S ;
Francis, J ;
Speroff, T ;
Gautam, S ;
Margolin, R ;
Sessler, CN ;
Dittus, RS ;
Bernard, GR .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2003, 289 (22) :2983-2991