Effect of Finite-time DS Controllers on Disturbance Rejection for Planar Bipeds

被引:2
作者
William, Daniel S. [1 ]
Martin, Anne E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Dept Mech & Nucl Engn, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
来源
2019 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE (ACC) | 2019年
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
WALKING; STABILITY; VARIABILITY; ROBOTS;
D O I
10.23919/acc.2019.8814423
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
For many planar bipedal models, each step is divided into a finite time single support period and an instantaneous double support period. During single support, the biped is typically underactuated and thus has limited ability to reject disturbances. The instantaneous nature of the double support period prevents control during this period. However, if the double support period is expanded to finite time, this introduces an overactuated period into the model which may improve disturbance rejection capabilities. This paper derives and compares the performance of two finite-time double support controllers. The first controller uses time to drive the progression of the double support period and controls the joint angles. The second controller uses a time-invariant phase variable to drive the progression of the double support period and controls the joint velocities since it is not possible to control the joint positions. The disturbance rejection capabilities of both controllers are then quantified using simulations. The instantaneous double support model is also simulated for comparison. The instantaneous double support model can recover from the largest disturbances but it requires the greatest number of steps to do. The time-based double support controller can recover from the smallest range of disturbances but requires the fewest number of steps for a given perturbation size.
引用
收藏
页码:4573 / 4579
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Long-Range Correlations in Stride Intervals May Emerge from Non-Chaotic Walking Dynamics [J].
Ahn, Jooeun ;
Hogan, Neville .
PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (09)
[2]  
Bapat RB, 2012, UNIVERSITEXT, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4471-2739-0
[3]   Efficient bipedal robots based on passive-dynamic walkers [J].
Collins, S ;
Ruina, A ;
Tedrake, R ;
Wisse, M .
SCIENCE, 2005, 307 (5712) :1082-1085
[4]   Cyclic gait planning and control of a five-link biped robot with four actuators during single support and double support phases [J].
Dehghani, Reza ;
Fattah, Abbas ;
Abedi, Esmaeil .
MULTIBODY SYSTEM DYNAMICS, 2015, 33 (04) :389-411
[5]   Local dynamic stability versus kinematic variability of continuous overground and treadmill walking [J].
Dingwell, JB ;
Cusumano, JP ;
Cavanagh, PR ;
Sternad, D .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICAL ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2001, 123 (01) :27-32
[6]   The simplest walking model: Stability, complexity, and scaling [J].
Garcia, M ;
Chatterjee, A ;
Ruina, A ;
Coleman, M .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICAL ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1998, 120 (02) :281-288
[7]   Postural stability of biped robots and the foot-rotation indicator (FRI) point [J].
Goswami, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROBOTICS RESEARCH, 1999, 18 (06) :523-533
[8]   DYNAMIC WALKING OF A VEHICLE WITH 2 TELESCOPIC LEGS CONTROLLED BY 2 DRIVES [J].
GRISHIN, AA ;
FORMALSKY, AM ;
LENSKY, AV ;
ZHITOMIRSKY, SV .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROBOTICS RESEARCH, 1994, 13 (02) :137-147
[9]   Stabilization of Periodic Orbits for Planar Walking With Noninstantaneous Double-Support Phase [J].
Hamed, Kaveh Akbari ;
Sadati, Nasser ;
Gruver, William A. ;
Dumont, Guy A. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART A-SYSTEMS AND HUMANS, 2012, 42 (03) :685-706
[10]  
Isidori A., 1995, NONLINEAR CONTROL SY, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-84628-615-5