Clinical introduction of Monte Carlo treatment planning for lung stereotactic body radiotherapy

被引:29
|
作者
Miura, Hideharu [1 ]
Masai, Norihisa [1 ]
Oh, Ryoong-Jin [1 ]
Shiomi, Hiroya [1 ]
Yamada, Kouichi [1 ]
Sasaki, Junichi [1 ]
Inoue, Toshihiko [1 ]
机构
[1] Miyakojima IGRT Clin, Osaka 5340021, Japan
来源
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS | 2014年 / 15卷 / 01期
关键词
Monte Carlo dose calculation; lung density; GTV size; dose prescription; stereotactic body radiation therapy; RADIATION-THERAPY; DOSIMETRIC EVALUATION; DOSE CALCULATION; CANCER; VERIFICATION; ALGORITHMS; FRACTIONS; OUTCOMES; VOLUME; GY;
D O I
10.1120/jacmp.v15i1.4202
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of Monte Carlo (MC) calculations and optimized dose definitions in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for lung cancer patients. We used a retrospective patient review and basic virtual phantom to determine dose prescriptions. Fifty-three patients underwent SBRT. A basic virtual phantom had a gross tumor volume (GTV) of 10.0 mm with equivalent water density of 1.0 g/cm(3), which was surrounded by equivalent lung surrounding the GTV of 0.25 g/cm(3). D95 of the planning target volume (PTV) and D99 of the GTV were evaluated with different GTV sizes (5.0 to 30.0 mm) and different lung densities (0.05 to 0.45 g/cm(3)). Prescribed dose was defined as 95% of the PTV should receive 100% of the dose (48 Gy/4 fractions) using pencil beam (PB) calculation and recalculated using MC calculation. In the patient study, average doses to the D95 of the PTV and D99 of the GTV using the MC calculation plan were 19.9% and 10.2% lower than those by the PB calculation plan, respectively. In the phantom study, decreased doses to the D95 of the PTV and D99 of the GTV using the MC calculation plan were accompanied with changes GTV size from 30.0 to 5.0 mm, which was decreased from 8.4% to 19.6% for the PTV and from 17.4% to 27.5% for the GTV. Similar results were seen with changes in lung density from 0.45 to 0.05 g/cm(3), with doses to the D95 of the PTV and D99 of the GTV were decreased from 12.8% to 59.0% and from 7.6% to 44.8%, respectively. The decrease in dose to the PTV with MC calculation was strongly dependent on lung density. We suggest that dose definition to the GTV for lung cancer SBRT be optimized using MC calculation. Our current clinical protocol for lung SBRT is based on a prescribed dose of 44 Gy in 4 fractions to the GTV using MC calculation.
引用
收藏
页码:38 / 46
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Forward treatment planning for modulated electron radiotherapy (MERT) employing Monte Carlo methods
    Henzen, D.
    Manser, P.
    Frei, D.
    Volken, W.
    Neuenschwander, H.
    Born, E. J.
    Loessl, K.
    Aebersold, D. M.
    Stampanoni, M. F. M.
    Fix, M. K.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (03)
  • [32] Stereotactic body radiotherapy for Ultra-Central lung Tumors: A systematic review and Meta-Analysis and International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society practice guidelines
    Yan, Michael
    Louie, Alexander, V
    Kotecha, Rupesh
    Ahmed, Md Ashfaq
    Zhang, Zhenwei
    Guckenberger, Matthias
    Kim, Mi-Sook
    Lo, Simon S.
    Scorsetti, Marta
    Tree, Alison C.
    Sahgal, Arjun
    Slotman, Ben J.
    LUNG CANCER, 2023, 182
  • [33] Effect of the normalized prescription isodose line on the magnitude of Monte Carlo vs. pencil beam target dose differences for lung stereotactic body radiotherapy
    Zheng, Dandan
    Zhang, Qinghui
    Liang, Xiaoying
    Zhu, Xiaofeng
    Verma, Vivek
    Wang, Shuo
    Zhou, Sumin
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 17 (04): : 48 - 58
  • [34] Predictive power of PTV volume for choosing manual or automatic planning in lung stereotactic body radiotherapy
    Duan, Yanhua
    Feng, Aihui
    Liu, Ning
    Shao, Yan
    Kong, Qing
    Zhou, Tao
    Xu, Zhiyong
    JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH AND APPLIED SCIENCES, 2024, 17 (03)
  • [35] A multi-institutional study to assess adherence to lung stereotactic body radiotherapy planning goals
    Woerner, Andrew
    Roeske, John C.
    Harkenrider, Matthew M.
    Fan, John
    Aydogan, Bulent
    Koshy, Matthew
    Laureckas, Robert
    Vali, Faisal
    Campana, Maria
    Surucu, Murat
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (08) : 4629 - 4635
  • [36] A method for optimizing planning target volume margins for patients receiving lung stereotactic body radiotherapy
    Wierzbicki, Marcin
    Mathew, Lindsay
    Swaminath, Anand
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2018, 63 (19):
  • [37] Choice of immobilization of stereotactic body radiotherapy in lung tumor patient by BMI
    Chen, Guofu
    Dong, Baiqiang
    Shan, Guoping
    Zhang, Xiuqin
    Tang, Huarong
    Li, Yuchen
    Wang, Zhenhua
    Xu, Wei
    Xu, Gang
    Yan, Guiming
    Zhang, Feiyan
    Hu, Xiao
    Yang, Jun
    Xu, Yujin
    Chen, Ming
    Wang, Jin
    BMC CANCER, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [38] Stereotactic body radiotherapy in patients with multiple lung tumors: a focus on lung dosimetric constraints
    Milano, Michael T.
    Mihai, Alina
    Kang, John
    Singh, Deepinder P.
    Verma, Vivek
    Qiu, Haoming
    Chen, Yuhchyau
    Kong, Feng-Ming
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2019, 19 (11) : 959 - 969
  • [39] Planning target volume density impact on treatment planning for lung stereotactic body radiation therapy
    Savanovic, Milovan
    Jaros, Drazan
    Foulquier, Jean-Noel
    ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2021, 60 (10) : 1296 - 1300
  • [40] MONITOR UNIT CHECKING IN HETEROGENEOUS STEREOTACTIC BODY RADIOTHERAPY TREATMENT PLANNING
    Higgins, Patrick D.
    Adolfson, Troy
    Cho, L. Chinsoo
    Saxena, Rishik
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2011, 36 (03) : 255 - 263