Clinical introduction of Monte Carlo treatment planning for lung stereotactic body radiotherapy

被引:29
|
作者
Miura, Hideharu [1 ]
Masai, Norihisa [1 ]
Oh, Ryoong-Jin [1 ]
Shiomi, Hiroya [1 ]
Yamada, Kouichi [1 ]
Sasaki, Junichi [1 ]
Inoue, Toshihiko [1 ]
机构
[1] Miyakojima IGRT Clin, Osaka 5340021, Japan
来源
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS | 2014年 / 15卷 / 01期
关键词
Monte Carlo dose calculation; lung density; GTV size; dose prescription; stereotactic body radiation therapy; RADIATION-THERAPY; DOSIMETRIC EVALUATION; DOSE CALCULATION; CANCER; VERIFICATION; ALGORITHMS; FRACTIONS; OUTCOMES; VOLUME; GY;
D O I
10.1120/jacmp.v15i1.4202
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of Monte Carlo (MC) calculations and optimized dose definitions in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for lung cancer patients. We used a retrospective patient review and basic virtual phantom to determine dose prescriptions. Fifty-three patients underwent SBRT. A basic virtual phantom had a gross tumor volume (GTV) of 10.0 mm with equivalent water density of 1.0 g/cm(3), which was surrounded by equivalent lung surrounding the GTV of 0.25 g/cm(3). D95 of the planning target volume (PTV) and D99 of the GTV were evaluated with different GTV sizes (5.0 to 30.0 mm) and different lung densities (0.05 to 0.45 g/cm(3)). Prescribed dose was defined as 95% of the PTV should receive 100% of the dose (48 Gy/4 fractions) using pencil beam (PB) calculation and recalculated using MC calculation. In the patient study, average doses to the D95 of the PTV and D99 of the GTV using the MC calculation plan were 19.9% and 10.2% lower than those by the PB calculation plan, respectively. In the phantom study, decreased doses to the D95 of the PTV and D99 of the GTV using the MC calculation plan were accompanied with changes GTV size from 30.0 to 5.0 mm, which was decreased from 8.4% to 19.6% for the PTV and from 17.4% to 27.5% for the GTV. Similar results were seen with changes in lung density from 0.45 to 0.05 g/cm(3), with doses to the D95 of the PTV and D99 of the GTV were decreased from 12.8% to 59.0% and from 7.6% to 44.8%, respectively. The decrease in dose to the PTV with MC calculation was strongly dependent on lung density. We suggest that dose definition to the GTV for lung cancer SBRT be optimized using MC calculation. Our current clinical protocol for lung SBRT is based on a prescribed dose of 44 Gy in 4 fractions to the GTV using MC calculation.
引用
收藏
页码:38 / 46
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Optimizing dose prescription in stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung tumours using Monte Carlo dose calculation
    Widder, Joachim
    Hollander, Miranda
    Ubbels, Jan F.
    Bolt, Rene A.
    Langendijk, Johannes A.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2010, 94 (01) : 42 - 46
  • [2] Comparing the clinical outcomes in stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung tumors between Ray-Tracing and Monte-Carlo algorithms
    Song, Jin Ho
    Kang, Ki Mun
    Choi, Hoon-Sik
    Jeong, Hojin
    Ha, In Bong
    Lee, Jong Deog
    Kim, Ho Cheol
    Jeong, Yi Yeong
    Cho, Yu Ji
    Lee, Seung Jun
    Kim, Sung Hwan
    Jang, In-Seok
    Jeong, Bae Kwon
    ONCOTARGET, 2016, 7 (14) : 19045 - 19053
  • [3] Questionnaire survey on treatment planning techniques for lung stereotactic body radiotherapy in Japan
    Ueda, Yoshihiro
    Takakura, Toru
    Ota, Seiichi
    Kito, Satoshi
    Sasaki, Koji
    Shimizu, Hidetoshi
    Tatsumi, Daisaku
    Yano, Shinsuke
    Nakamura, Mitsuhiro
    JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2020, 61 (01) : 104 - 116
  • [4] Assessment of Monte Carlo algorithm for compliance with RTOG 0915 dosimetric criteria in peripheral lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy
    Pokhrel, Damodar
    Sood, Sumit
    Badkul, Rajeev
    Jiang, Hongyu
    McClinton, Christopher
    Lominska, Christopher
    Kumar, Parvesh
    Wang, Fen
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 17 (03): : 277 - 293
  • [5] Evaluation of ray tracing and Monte Carlo algorithms in dose calculation and clinical outcomes for robotic stereotactic body radiotherapy of lung cancers
    Braunstein, Steve E.
    Dionisio, Sebastian A.
    Lometti, Michael W.
    Pinnaduwage, Dilini S.
    Chuang, Cynthia F.
    Yom, Sue S.
    Gottschalk, Alexander R.
    Descovich, Martina
    JOURNAL OF RADIOSURGERY AND SBRT, 2014, 3 (01): : 67 - 79
  • [6] Comparison of pencil beam-based homogeneous vs inhomogeneous target dose planning for stereotactic body radiotherapy of peripheral lung tumors through Monte Carlo-based recalculation
    Ohtakara, Kazuhiro
    Hoshi, Hiroaki
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2015, 40 (03) : 248 - 255
  • [7] Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Central Lung Tumors
    Rowe, Bryan P.
    Boffa, Daniel J.
    Wilson, Lynn D.
    Kim, Anthony W.
    Detterbeck, Frank C.
    Decker, Roy H.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2012, 7 (09) : 1394 - 1399
  • [8] Clinical introduction of Monte Carlo treatment planning: A different prescription dose for non-small cell lung cancer according to tumor location and size
    van Zyp, Noelle C. van der Voort
    Hoogeman, Mischa S.
    van de Water, Steven
    Levendag, Peter C.
    van der Holt, Bronno
    Heijmen, Ben J. M.
    Nuyttens, Joost J.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2010, 96 (01) : 55 - 60
  • [9] Long term results of single high dose Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in the treatment of primary lung tumors
    Nicosia, Luca
    Reverberi, Chiara
    Agolli, Linda
    Marinelli, Luca
    De Sanctis, Vitaliana
    Valeriani, Maurizio
    Osti, Mattia F.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2019, 9 (1)
  • [10] Evaluation of Automated Treatment Planning and Organ Dose Prediction for Lung Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy
    Ouyang, Zi
    Zhuang, Tingliang
    Marwaha, Gaurav
    Kolar, Matthew D.
    Qi, Peng
    Videtic, Gregory M.
    Stephans, Kevin L.
    Xia, Ping
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 13 (10)