Poleward microtubule flux is a major component of spindle dynamics and anaphase A in mitotic Drosophila embryos

被引:85
作者
Maddox, P [1 ]
Desai, A
Oegema, K
Mitchison, TJ
Salmon, ED
机构
[1] Marine Biol Lab, Cell Div Grp, Woods Hole, MA 02543 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Dept Biol, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[3] Max Planck Inst Cell Biol & Genet, D-01307 Dresden, Germany
[4] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dept Cell Biol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0960-9822(02)01183-1
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
During cell division, eukaryotic cells assemble dynamic microtubule-based spindles to segregate replicated chromosomes [1, 2]. Rapid spindle microtubule turnover, likely derived from dynamic instability, has been documented in yeasts [3,4], plants [5] and vertebrates [6]. Less studied is concerted spindle microtubule poleward translocation (flux) coupled to depolymerization at spindle poles [7]. Microtubule flux has been observed only in vertebrates [7], although there is indirect evidence for it in insect spermatocytes [8, 9] and higher plants [10]. Here we use fluorescent speckle microscopy (FSM) to demonstrate that mitotic spindles of syncytial Drosophila embryos exhibit poleward microtubule flux, indicating that flux is a widely conserved property of spindles. By simultaneously imaging chromosomes (or kinetochores) and flux, we provide evidence that flux is the dominant mechanism driving chromosome-to-pole movement (anaphase A) in these spindles. At 18 C and 24 C, separated sister chromatids moved poleward at average rates (3.6 and 6.6 mum/min, respectively) slightly greater than the mean rates of poleward flux (3.2 and 5.2 mum/min, respectively). However, at 24 C the rate of kinetochoreto-pole movement varied from slower than to twice the mean rate of flux, suggesting that although flux is the dominant mechanism, kinetochore-associated microtubule depolymerization contributes to anaphase A.
引用
收藏
页码:1670 / 1674
页数:5
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Anaphase A chromosome movement and poleward spindle microtubule flux occur at similar rates in Xenopus extract spindles [J].
Desai, A ;
Maddox, PS ;
Mitchison, TJ ;
Salmon, ED .
JOURNAL OF CELL BIOLOGY, 1998, 141 (03) :703-713
[2]  
Francis-Lang H, 1999, METH MOL B, V122, P223
[3]   Mitotic spindle poles are organized by structural and motor proteins in addition to centrosomes [J].
Gaglio, T ;
Dionne, MA ;
Compton, DA .
JOURNAL OF CELL BIOLOGY, 1997, 138 (05) :1055-1066
[4]   Microtubule treadmilling in vitro investigated by fluorescence speckle and confocal microscopy [J].
Grego, S ;
Cantillana, V ;
Salmon, ED .
BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 81 (01) :66-78
[5]  
HARD R, 1977, J CELL SCI, V27, P47
[6]   MEI-S332, A DROSOPHILA PROTEIN REQUIRED FOR SISTER-CHROMATID COHESION, CAN LOCALIZE TO MEIOTIC CENTROMERE REGIONS [J].
KERREBROCK, AW ;
MOORE, DP ;
WU, JS ;
ORRWEAVER, TL .
CELL, 1995, 83 (02) :247-256
[7]   Microtubule flux mediates poleward motion of acentric chromosome fragments during meiosis in insect spermatocytes [J].
LaFountain, JR ;
Oldenbourg, R ;
Cole, RW ;
Rieder, CL .
MOLECULAR BIOLOGY OF THE CELL, 2001, 12 (12) :4054-4065
[8]   MEIOSIS IN DROSOPHILA-MELANOGASTER .1. CHROMOSOME IDENTIFICATION AND KINETOCHORE MICROTUBULE NUMBERS DURING THE 1ST AND 2ND MEIOTIC DIVISIONS IN MALES [J].
LIN, HPP ;
AULT, JG ;
CHURCH, K .
CHROMOSOMA, 1981, 83 (04) :507-521
[9]   The polarity and dynamics of microtubule assembly in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae [J].
Maddox, PS ;
Bloom, KS ;
Salmon, ED .
NATURE CELL BIOLOGY, 2000, 2 (01) :36-41
[10]   A switch in microtubule dynamics at the onset of anaphase B in the mitotic spindle of Schizosaccharomyces pombe [J].
Mallavarapu, A ;
Sawin, K ;
Mitchison, T .
CURRENT BIOLOGY, 1999, 9 (23) :1423-1426