Immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) with direct, anatomic, extra-projection prosthesis -: 102 cases

被引:12
作者
Fernandez Delgado, Jorge M.
Martinez-Mendez, Jose R.
de Santiago, Javier
Hernandez-Cortes, Gines
Casado, Cesar
机构
[1] Hosp La Paz, Plast Surg & Burns Dept, Madrid 28034, Spain
[2] Hosp La Paz, Dept Gynecol, Madrid 28034, Spain
关键词
immediate breast reconstruction; anatomical prostheses; skin-sparing mastectomy; breast cancer;
D O I
10.1097/01.sap.0000232820.83547.62
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
There are different methods described until now for immediate breast reconstruction. Despite the use of autologous flaps considered by many authors, implants are considered as an option by others. A prospective study of 102 clinical cases was designed, including a 1-year follow-up in which glands were reconstructed by immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) with direct, extra projection, anatomic prostheses located in a submuscular pocket after a skin-sparing mastectomy. The prosthesis coverage was made by the muscle in its upper two thirds and by using the skin from the mastectomy in its lower third. The cosmetic results obtained were evaluated according to the volume, form, and symmetry achieved using a linear numeric analogical score. This evaluation had an averaged value of 2.79 +/- 0.8 in our scale from poor (0) to excellent result (4). The overall rate of complications was 15.7% of the cases, with seroma being the most frequent. In conclusion, this preliminary study demonstrates that immediate breast reconstruction with a direct, extra projection, anatomic prosthesis is a good alternative. Nevertheless, more long-term studies with a higher number of patients and using an SF-36 for patient satisfaction are needed to confirm these results.
引用
收藏
页码:99 / 104
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] The psychological impact of immediate rather than delayed breast reconstruction
    Al-Ghazal, SK
    Sully, L
    Fallowfield, L
    Blamey, RW
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 26 (01): : 17 - 19
  • [2] Determinants of patient satisfaction in postmastectomy breast reconstruction
    Alderman, AK
    Wilkins, EG
    Lowery, JC
    Kim, M
    Davis, JA
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2000, 106 (04) : 769 - 776
  • [3] BREAST RECONSTRUCTION WITH SUBMUSCULAR PROSTHESIS AFTER MODIFIED RADICAL OR SIMPLE MASTECTOMY - SURGICAL TECHNIQUE AND EARLY COMPLICATIONS
    ASPLUND, O
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY AND HAND SURGERY, 1983, 17 (02): : 141 - 146
  • [4] Modified technique for nipple-areolar reconstruction: A case series
    Bogue, DP
    Mungara, AF
    Thompson, M
    Cederna, PS
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2003, 112 (05) : 1274 - 1278
  • [5] Bostwick J, 2000, PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTI
  • [7] Carlson GW, 1996, AM SURGEON, V62, P151
  • [8] Skin-sparing mastectomy - Oncologic and reconstructive considerations
    Carlson, GW
    Bostwick, J
    Styblo, TM
    Moore, B
    Bried, JT
    Murray, DR
    Wood, WC
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1997, 225 (05) : 570 - 575
  • [9] Local recurrence after skin-sparing mastectomy: A manifestation of tumor biology or surgical conservatism?
    Carlson, GW
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 1998, 5 (07) : 571 - 572
  • [10] WOUND COMPLICATIONS IN PATIENTS RECEIVING ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY AFTER MASTECTOMY AND IMMEDIATE BREAST RECONSTRUCTION FOR BREAST-CANCER
    FUREY, PC
    MACGILLIVRAY, DC
    CASTIGLIONE, CL
    ALLEN, L
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 1994, 55 (03) : 194 - 197