Consumption in the Circular Economy: Learning from Our Mistakes

被引:36
作者
Georgantzis Garcia, Dimitris [1 ,2 ]
Kipnis, Eva [1 ]
Vasileiou, Efi [3 ,4 ]
Solomon, Adrian [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sheffield, Sheffield Univ Management Sch, Sheffield S10 1FL, S Yorkshire, England
[2] South East European Res Ctr SEERC, Thessaloniki 54622, Greece
[3] Univ Cote Azur, GREDEG, F-06560 Valbonne, France
[4] Univ York Europe Campus, CITY Coll, Thessaloniki 54626, Greece
关键词
circular economy; sustainable consumption; consumer behavior; sustainable development; intention– behavior gap; planetary boundaries; PRO-ENVIRONMENTAL BEHAVIOR; FAIR-TRADE; SUSTAINABLE CONSUMPTION; HYPOTHETICAL BIAS; ETHICAL CONSUMER; GREEN CONSUMERS; INTENTIONS; FOOD; GAP; PREFERENCES;
D O I
10.3390/su13020601
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The Circular Economy (CE) is gaining increasing attention among businesses, policymakers and academia, and across research disciplines. While the concept's strong diffusion may be considered its main strength, it has also contributed to the emergence of many different understandings and definitions, which may hinder or slow down its success. Specifically, despite growing attention, the role of the consumption side in the CE remains a largely under-researched topic. In the present review, we first search the literature by means of snowball mapping and a systematic key-word strategy, and then critically analyze the identified sources in order to elucidate the fundamental elements that should characterize consumption in a CE. We extract two pillars, directly from definition, that should be at the nucleus of future research on consumption in the CE: (1) the hierarchical nature of circular strategies, with "reduce" being preferred to all other strategies; and (2) the inadequacy of defining the CE only through its loops or strategies without considering its goal of attaining sustainable development. Moreover, the discussion is placed within the extant consumer research streams deemed relevant, in order to bridge these with the context of the CE. We highlight limitations of said research streams regarding their typical focus on the quality (and not the quantity) of consumption, the lack of heterogeneity in the theories and data collection methods employed, and the non-impact-based instruments typically used to measure consumption behaviors. We show how these limitations have contributed to the emergence of the intention-behavior gap, a phenomenon extant studies identify as key to overcome for encouraging sustainable consumption practices. In particular, we focus the analysis on the intention-behavior gap in order to: (1) establish the state-of-the-art; and (2) uncover avenues for future research addressing extant limitations.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 23
页数:23
相关论文
共 146 条
[1]  
Abdallah S., 2009, HAPPY PLANET INDEX 2
[2]   Explaining the discrepancy between intentions and actions: The case of hypothetical bias in contingent valuation [J].
Ajzen, I ;
Brown, TC ;
Carvajal, F .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2004, 30 (09) :1108-1121
[3]   PREDICTION OF GOAL-DIRECTED BEHAVIOR - ATTITUDES, INTENTIONS, AND PERCEIVED BEHAVIORAL-CONTROL [J].
AJZEN, I ;
MADDEN, TJ .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 22 (05) :453-474
[4]   Consumer scapegoatism and limits to green consumerism [J].
Akenji, Lewis .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2014, 63 :13-23
[5]   Jevons' paradox [J].
Alcott, B .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2005, 54 (01) :9-21
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2010, ASSESSING ENV IMPACT
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2015, HDB RES SUSTAINABLE
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1998, HDB SOCIAL PSYCHOL
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2010, STATE WORLD 2010 TRA
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2005, SUSTAIN DEV RES NETW