共 50 条
Dialysis catheter management practices in Australia and New Zealand
被引:12
|作者:
Smyth, Brendan
[1
,2
]
Kotwal, Sradha
[1
,4
]
Gallagher, Martin
[1
,3
]
Gray, Nicholas A.
[5
,6
]
Polkinghorne, Kevan
[7
,8
,9
]
机构:
[1] Univ New South Wales, George Inst Global Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Sydney Sch Publ Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Sydney, Concord Clin Sch, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Prince Wales Hosp, Dept Nephrol, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[5] Sunshine Coast Univ Hosp, Dept Renal Med, Sunshine Coast, Qld, Australia
[6] Univ Queensland, Sunshine Coast Clin Sch, Sunshine Coast, Qld, Australia
[7] Monash Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Prevent Med, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[8] Monash Univ, Monash Med Ctr, Dept Nephrol, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[9] Monash Univ, Monash Med Ctr, Dept Med, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
来源:
基金:
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词:
Australia;
catheter-related infection;
central venous catheter;
New Zealand;
renal dialysis;
STREAM INFECTION-RATES;
HEMODIALYSIS-PATIENTS;
TRISODIUM CITRATE;
LOCK SOLUTION;
DYSFUNCTION;
PREVENTION;
TRIAL;
BACTEREMIA;
COSTS;
D O I:
10.1111/nep.13507
中图分类号:
R5 [内科学];
R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100201 ;
摘要:
Aim Dialysis catheter-associated infections (CAI) are a serious and costly burden on patients and the health-care system. Many approaches to minimizing catheter use and infection prophylaxis are available and the practice patterns in Australia and New Zealand are not known. We aimed to describe dialysis catheter management practices in dialysis units in Australia and New Zealand. Methods Online survey comprising 52 questions, completed by representatives from dialysis units from both countries. Results Of 64 contacted units, 48 (75%) responded (Australia 43, New Zealand 5), representing 79% of the dialysis population in both countries. Nephrologists (including trainees) inserted non-tunnelled catheters at 60% and tunnelled catheters at 31% of units. Prophylactic antibiotics were given with catheter insertion at 21% of units. Heparin was the most common locking solution for both non-tunnelled (77%) and tunnelled catheters (69%), with antimicrobial locks being predominant only in New Zealand (80%). Eight different combinations of exit site dressing were in use, with an antibiotic patch being most common (35%). All units in New Zealand and 84% of those in Australia undertook CAI surveillance. However, only 51% of those units were able to provide a figure for their most recent rate of catheter-associated bacteraemia per 1000 catheter days. Conclusion There is wide variation in current dialysis catheter management practice and CAI surveillance is suboptimal. Increased attention to the scope and quality of CAI surveillance is warranted and further evidence to guide infection prevention is required.
引用
收藏
页码:827 / 834
页数:8
相关论文