Reasons 9-1-1 Is Called for Cardiac Arrest Cases in Which No Resuscitation Is Attempted

被引:5
作者
Meischke, Hendrika [1 ]
Chavez, Devora [1 ]
Feder, Sylvia [3 ]
Rea, Tom [2 ]
Albert, Tyler [2 ]
Eisenberg, Mickey [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Hlth Serv, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Med, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] King Cty Med One, Kent, WA USA
关键词
end-of-life; EMS; resuscitation; calls; 9-1-1; OF-LIFE DECISIONS; COMMUNICATION; PREFERENCES;
D O I
10.1080/10903120802706278
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objective. The goal of this investigation was to describe the reasons emergency medical services (EMS) is activated when resuscitation is not desired or when patients show signs of irreversible death. Methods. All medical incident report forms (MIRFs) indicating a cardiac arrest for which resuscitation was withheld were obtained from five participating fire departments. For each eligible case (N = 196), one of the emergency medical technicians (EMTs) present at the scene was interviewed and the dispatch tape of the 9-1-1 call was reviewed. Patient and caller characteristics were abstracted from the MIRFs and dispatch tapes. The EMTs were asked about the reasons for the call, whether the family expected this death, and the caller's emotional state when EMS arrived at the scene. In addition, EMS providers were asked open-ended questions about the services they provided for the patient and patient's family. Using chi-square statistics and t-tests, we compared two groups: 1) patients for whom resuscitation was not desired as indicated by a do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order, terminal illness, or hospice (n = 66) and 2) patients for whom resuscitation was not started because of signs of irreversible death (n = 130). Results. Compared with callers for patients with signs of irreversible death, callers for patients for whom resuscitation was not desired were less likely to access EMS because they needed medical assistance (11% versus 30%) and more likely to call 9-1-1 because they thought it was required by law (30% versus 8%). Other common reasons in both groups for activating 9-1-1 were confusion regarding what to do and a request to confirm death. The most frequently reported service provided by EMTs for both groups was to offer to contact a chaplain. Conclusion. In a third of patients for whom EMS did not initiate resuscitation, resuscitation was withheld primarily because it was not desired rather than because there was evidence of irreversible death. Efforts to improve education may prevent EMS activation in these cases. An alternative EMS response could also help ensure patient autonomy and decrease costs to the EMS system.
引用
收藏
页码:335 / 340
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], STAT COUNT QUICKFACT
  • [2] Discussing resuscitation preferences with patients: Challenges and rewards
    Chittenden, Eva H.
    Clark, Susannah T.
    Pantilat, Steven Z.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL MEDICINE, 2006, 1 (04) : 231 - 240
  • [3] Communication and decision-making in seriously ill patients: Findings of the SUPPORT project
    Covinsky, KE
    Fuller, JD
    Yaffe, K
    Johnston, CB
    Hamel, MB
    Lynn, J
    Teno, JM
    Phillips, RS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2000, 48 (05) : S187 - S193
  • [4] *DIV EM MED SERV P, 2008, 2008 ANN REP KING CO
  • [5] EXPECTED DEATH AND UNWANTED RESUSCITATION IN THE PREHOSPITAL SETTING
    DULL, SM
    GRAVES, JR
    LARSEN, MP
    CUMMINS, RO
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1994, 23 (05) : 997 - 1002
  • [6] Withholding resuscitation: A new approach to prehospital end-of-life decisions
    Feder, S
    Matheny, RL
    Loveless, RS
    Rea, TD
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2006, 144 (09) : 634 - 640
  • [7] HAUFF SR, 2003, EMERG MED SERV, V42, P1
  • [8] Patient preferences for communication with physicians about end-of-life decisions
    Hofmann, JC
    Wenger, NS
    Davis, RB
    Teno, J
    Connors, AF
    Desbiens, N
    Lynn, J
    Phillips, RS
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1997, 127 (01) : 1 - +
  • [9] CRITERIA FOR DEAD-ON-ARRIVALS, PREHOSPITAL TERMINATION OF CPR, AND DO-NOT-RESUSCITATE ORDERS
    KELLERMANN, AL
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1993, 22 (01) : 47 - 51
  • [10] Koenig K L, 1993, Prehosp Disaster Med, V8, P51