Applying ecosystem services indicators in landscape planning and management: The ES-in-Planning framework

被引:136
作者
Albert, Christian [1 ,2 ]
Galler, Carolin [1 ]
Hermes, Johannes [1 ]
Neuendorf, Felix [1 ]
von Haaren, Christina [1 ]
Lovett, Andrew [3 ]
机构
[1] Leibniz Univ Hannover, Inst Environm Planning, D-30419 Hannover, Germany
[2] UFZ Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Dept Environm Polit, D-04318 Leipzig, Germany
[3] Univ E Anglia, Sch Environm Sci, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England
关键词
Ecosystem functions; Ecosystem services; Indicators; Landscape planning; DPSIR; Decision support; Landscape; DECISION-MAKING; SUPPORT; REQUIREMENTS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.03.029
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Applying ecosystem services (ES) concepts and indicators in landscape planning requires them to be linked with models for decision-making by practitioners. The objective of this paper is to introduce an ES-in-Planning framework, which combines ES assessment and valuation indicators with the widely used Driving Forces, Pressures, State, Impacts and Responses (DPSIR) model. Within this framework, ES indicators become part of landscape planning as a means of assessing the current state of the environment and for determining how it might change in the future. The implementation and added value of the framework is illustrated in a case study of planning issues in the Mardorf community bordering the Steinhuder Meer Lake, Northern Germany. Two scenarios of potential landscape changes and possible response measures are considered in terms of alterations in a set of ES indicators. The ES examined are food production (a provisioning ES), climate mitigation (a regulation ES), landscape esthetics (as the basis for many cultural ES), and biodiversity. The ES indicators employed distinguish between services valued by humans and those which are actually utilized. Valuation of changes in ES has shown to reflect societal objectives (as institutionalized in legal requirements) and expert-based estimates. However, these valuations could be further validated by including economic and social valuation of impacts. The added value of applying ES in the planning process lies in improved opportunities for developing targeted response measures, for communicating trade-offs between planning options, and for facilitating joint implementation by partners. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:100 / 113
页数:14
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
Albert C., DISCUSSION IN PRESS
[2]  
Albert C, 2014, LANDSCAPE ECOL, V29, P1301, DOI [10.1007/s10980-014-0085-0, 10.1007/s10980-014-9990-5]
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2011, The UK National Ecosystem Assessment: Synthesis of the Key Findings
[4]  
Bastian O., 1994, Analyse und okologische Bewertung der Landschaft
[5]  
Bierhals E., 2004, INFORM D NATURSCHUTZ, V24, P231
[6]  
Bredemeier B., 2014, ECOL MODELL
[7]  
Burkhard B., 2014, Landscape Online
[8]   Mapping recreation and aesthetic value of ecosystems in the Bilbao Metropolitan Greenbelt (northern Spain) to support landscape planning [J].
Casado-Arzuaga, Izaskun ;
Onaindia, Miren ;
Madariaga, Iosu ;
Verburg, Peter H. .
LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2014, 29 (08) :1393-1405
[9]   An operational model for mainstreaming ecosystem services for implementation [J].
Cowling, Richard M. ;
Egoh, Benis ;
Knight, Andrew T. ;
O'Farrell, Patrick J. ;
Reyers, Belinda ;
Rouget'll, Mathieu ;
Roux, Dirk J. ;
Welz, Adam ;
Wilhelm-Rechman, Angelika .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2008, 105 (28) :9483-9488
[10]   Ecosystem services in decision making: time to deliver [J].
Daily, Gretchen C. ;
Polasky, Stephen ;
Goldstein, Joshua ;
Kareiva, Peter M. ;
Mooney, Harold A. ;
Pejchar, Liba ;
Ricketts, Taylor H. ;
Salzman, James ;
Shallenberger, Robert .
FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 7 (01) :21-28