Influence of Layer Thickness on the Design of Rapid-Prototyped Models

被引:14
作者
Aghanajafi, C. [1 ]
Daneshmand, S. [2 ]
Nadooshan, A. Ahmadi [2 ]
机构
[1] Khajeh Nasier Toosi Univ Technol, Dept Mech Engn, Tehran 1956983911, Iran
[2] Islamic Azad Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Majlesi Branch, Esfahan 8159716778, Iran
来源
JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT | 2009年 / 46卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.2514/1.39702
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Today, engineers are aiming for performance, quality, and repeatability, to be reached in a very short delivery time. Rapid-prototyping techniques are applied to concept design and modeling. A typical aircraft development program usually needs at least four to five wind-tunnel models to adequately test the aerodynamics of a new airframe. The models are generally made of steel or aluminum. The models can require months to be manufactured. The dimensional accuracy, surface finish, and strength of such all-metal models have a distinguished history of providing high-fidelity aerodynamics data for both subsonic and supersonic aircraft. However, the fabrication of all-metal wind-tunnel models is very expensive and time-consuming. This paper describes the effects of layer-thickness models on aerodynamic coefficients to construct wind-tunnel-testing models produced with rapid prototyping. These models were fabricated from SOMOS NanoTool by stereolithography. The layer thickness for each model was 0.025, 0.05, and 0.1 mm. Testing covered the Mach range of Mach 0.10 to 0.40. Results from this study show that layer thickness does have an effect on aerodynamic characteristics. The layer thickness is more effective on the aerodynamic characteristics when Mach number is decreased and has the most effect on the aerodynamic characteristics of axial force.
引用
收藏
页码:981 / 987
页数:7
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], J FLUID SCI TECHNOL
[2]  
Bocking C, 1997, GEC J TECHNOL, V14, P110
[3]   Development of a new sheet deposition type rapid prototyping system [J].
Cho, I ;
Lee, K ;
Choi, W ;
Song, YA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MACHINE TOOLS & MANUFACTURE, 2000, 40 (12) :1813-1829
[4]   A comparison of rapid prototyping techniques used for wind tunnel model fabrication [J].
Chuk, Raymond N. ;
Thomson, Vincent J. .
RAPID PROTOTYPING JOURNAL, 1998, 4 (04) :185-196
[5]   Investigation of surface roughness on aerodynamics properties [J].
Daneshmand, S. ;
Dehghani, A. R. ;
Aghanajafi, C. .
JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 2007, 44 (05) :1630-1634
[6]  
Hildebrand Richard J., 2003, 21 AIAA APPL AER C O
[7]   Composite rapid prototyping: overcoming the drawback of poor mechanical properties [J].
Karalekas, D ;
Antoniou, K .
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 153 :526-530
[8]   Rapid prototyping integrated systems [J].
Onuh, SO .
RAPID PROTOTYPING JOURNAL, 2001, 7 (04) :220-223
[9]   Evaluating aerodynamic characteristics of wind-tunnel models produced by rapid prototyping methods [J].
Springer, A .
JOURNAL OF SPACECRAFT AND ROCKETS, 1998, 35 (06) :755-759
[10]  
Springer A., 1997, 15 AIAA APPL AER C J