Predictive modeling of proliferative vitreoretinopathy using automated machine learning by ophthalmologists without coding experience

被引:25
作者
Antaki, Fares [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kahwati, Ghofril [4 ,5 ]
Sebag, Julia [1 ]
Coussa, Razek Georges [6 ]
Fanous, Anthony [7 ]
Duval, Renaud [1 ,3 ]
Sebag, Mikael [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Montreal, Dept Ophthalmol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] Ctr Hosp Univ Montreal CHUM, Dept Ophthalmol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] Hop Maison Neuve Rosemont, Ctr Univ Ophtalmol CUO, CIUSSS Est Ile Montreal, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[4] Inst Natl Sci Appl Toulouse INSA Toulouse, Toulouse, France
[5] Ecole Technol Super ETS, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[6] Univ Iowa, Dept Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, Carver Coll Med, Iowa City, IA USA
[7] McGill Univ, Fac Med, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
CLINICAL RISK-FACTORS; RETINAL-DETACHMENT; EXTERNAL VALIDATION; CLASSIFICATION;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-020-76665-3
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
We aimed to assess the feasibility of machine learning (ML) algorithm design to predict proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) by ophthalmologists without coding experience using automated ML (AutoML). The study was a retrospective cohort study of 506 eyes who underwent pars plana vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) by a single surgeon at a tertiary-care hospital between 2012 and 2019. Two ophthalmologists without coding experience used an interactive application in MATLAB to build and evaluate ML algorithms for the prediction of postoperative PVR using clinical data from the electronic health records. The clinical features associated with postoperative PVR were determined by univariate feature selection. The area under the curve (AUC) for predicting postoperative PVR was better for models that included pre-existing PVR as an input. The quadratic support vector machine (SVM) model built using all selected clinical features had an AUC of 0.90, a sensitivity of 63.0%, and a specificity of 97.8%. An optimized Naive Bayes algorithm that did not include pre-existing PVR as an input feature had an AUC of 0.81, a sensitivity of 54.3%, and a specificity of 92.4%. In conclusion, the development of ML models for the prediction of PVR by ophthalmologists without coding experience is feasible. Input from a data scientist might still be needed to tackle class imbalance-a common challenge in ML classification using real-world clinical data.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], IJCAI
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, INT J COMPUTER SCI N, DOI [DOI 10.48550/ARXIV.1305.1707, 10.48550/arxiv.1305.1707]
[3]   A survey of cross-validation procedures for model selection [J].
Arlot, Sylvain ;
Celisse, Alain .
STATISTICS SURVEYS, 2010, 4 :40-79
[4]   How to predict proliferative vitreoretinopathy - A prospective study [J].
Asaria, RHY ;
Kon, CH ;
Bunce, C ;
Charteris, DG ;
Wong, D ;
Luthert, P ;
Khaw, PT ;
Aylward, GW .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2001, 108 (07) :1184-1186
[5]  
Bergstra J., P 12 PYTH SCI C, V20
[6]   External validation is necessary in, prediction research: A clinical example [J].
Bleeker, SE ;
Moll, HA ;
Steyerberg, EW ;
Donders, ART ;
Derksen-Lubsen, G ;
Grobbee, DE ;
Moons, KGM .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2003, 56 (09) :826-832
[7]   Machine Learning Techniques in Clinical Vision Sciences [J].
Caixinha, Miguel ;
Nunes, Sandrina .
CURRENT EYE RESEARCH, 2017, 42 (01) :1-15
[8]   Deep Learning and Its Applications in Biomedicine [J].
Cao, Chensi ;
Liu, Feng ;
Tan, Hai ;
Song, Deshou ;
Shu, Wenjie ;
Li, Weizhong ;
Zhou, Yiming ;
Bo, Xiaochen ;
Xie, Zhi .
GENOMICS PROTEOMICS & BIOINFORMATICS, 2018, 16 (01) :17-32
[9]   SMOTE: Synthetic minority over-sampling technique [J].
Chawla, Nitesh V. ;
Bowyer, Kevin W. ;
Hall, Lawrence O. ;
Kegelmeyer, W. Philip .
2002, American Association for Artificial Intelligence (16)
[10]  
Collins GS, 2015, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V350, DOI [10.1111/1471-0528.13244, 10.1136/bmj.g7594]