Measuring functional change in children with Acquired Brain Injury (ABI): Comparison of generic and ABI-specific scales using the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI)

被引:33
作者
Kothari, DH
Haley, SM
Gill-Body, KM
Dumas, HM
机构
[1] VA Rehabil Res & Dev Ctr, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
[2] Boston Univ, Sargent Coll Hlth & Rehabil Sci, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[3] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, MGH Inst Hlth Prof, Phys Therapy Serv, Boston, MA USA
[4] Franciscan Childrens Hosp, Res Ctr Children Special Hlth Care Needs, Boston, MA USA
[5] Rehabil Ctr, Boston, MA USA
来源
PHYSICAL THERAPY | 2003年 / 83卷 / 09期
关键词
item response theory; outcome measurement; pediatric brain injury; Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory; Rasch measurement;
D O I
10.1093/ptj/83.9.776
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Purpose. The Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI) subscales are hierarchic in nature, with item placements within each subscale reflecting the general order of skill attainment in children without disabilities. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a hierarchical subscale developed in this study for children with acquired brain injuries (ABIs) corresponds to the generic PEDI subscales, and, if not, whether condition-specific (ABI-specific) PEDI subscales are more sensitive for measuring change. Subjects. Eighty-seven children and adolescents (mean age=9.2 years, SD=5.2, range=1-20) with ABI during inpatient rehabilitation admissions were included. Methods. Data were collected by retrospective chart review. Rasch one-parameter analyses were conducted to construct the ABI-specific PEDI scale focusing on the Mobility and Self-care domains (content areas) only. Each domain consists of a Functional Skills subscale and a Caregiver Assistance subscale. Thus, in all, 4 scales were constructed within the ABI-specific PEDI scale. Differences in item hierarchies and sensitivity between generic and ABI-specific PEDI subscales for each domain were then examined. Results. Both generic and ABI-specific PEDI scales were sensitive for measuring functional changes during inpatient rehabilitation hospitalization. Even though the generic and ABI-specific item hierarchies differed substantially, only one of the 4 ABI-specific PEDI subscales (Caregiver Assistance Self-care subscale) was more sensitive for measuring change than the generic PEDI scale. Discussion and Conclusion. The ABI-specific scales added relatively little improvement in sensitivity compared with the generic PEDI scales of the Mobility and Self-care domains. Thus, for group analyses, the authors recommend use of the generic PEDI subscales for children with ABI. Future work with ABI-specific subscales may improve the physical therapist's ability to describe an individual's pattern of functional recovery.
引用
收藏
页码:776 / 785
页数:10
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], INFANTS YOUNG CHILDR
[2]   Rasch analysis of the Gross Motor Function Measure: Validating the assumptions of the Rasch model to create an interval-level measure [J].
Avery, LM ;
Russell, DJ ;
Raina, PS ;
Walter, SD ;
Rosenbaum, PL .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2003, 84 (05) :697-705
[3]   Patterns of Developmental and Behavioral Progress for Young Brain-Injured Children During Interdisciplinary Intervention [J].
Bagnato, Stephen J. ;
Mayes, Susan Dickerson .
DEVELOPMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 2 (03) :213-240
[4]   THE RELATIONSHIPS AMONG SENSORIMOTOR COMPONENTS, FINE MOTOR SKILL, AND FUNCTIONAL PERFORMANCE IN PRESCHOOL-CHILDREN [J].
CASESMITH, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 1995, 49 (07) :645-652
[5]  
Cella D, 2000, MED CARE, V38, P66
[6]  
FAY GC, 1994, ARCH PHYS MED REHAB, V75, P733
[7]   CONCURRENT AND CONSTRUCT-VALIDITY OF THE PEDIATRIC EVALUATION OF DISABILITY INVENTORY [J].
FELDMAN, AB ;
HALEY, SM ;
CORYELL, J .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1990, 70 (10) :602-610
[8]   Motor performance following a mild traumatic brain injury in children: an exploratory study [J].
Gagnon, I ;
Forget, R ;
Sullivan, SJ ;
Friedman, D .
BRAIN INJURY, 1998, 12 (10) :843-853
[9]  
Haley S.M., 1992, PEDIAT EVALUATION DI
[10]  
Haley S. M., 1993, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics, V4, P529, DOI DOI 10.1016/S1047-9651(18)30568-0