Research Misconduct in Japan and How It Is Covered by the Media

被引:1
作者
Enoki, Eisuke [1 ]
机构
[1] Kinki Univ Hosp, Clin Res Ctr, 377-2 Ohno Higashi, Osaka, Osaka 5898511, Japan
来源
YAKUGAKU ZASSHI-JOURNAL OF THE PHARMACEUTICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN | 2018年 / 138卷 / 04期
关键词
research integrity; research misconduct; fabrication; falsification; plagiarism;
D O I
10.1248/yakushi.17-00181-1
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Cases of research misconduct (fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism) have been increasing worldwide, including in Japan. In particular, since 2006, many cases of research misconduct have been reported in Japan, and these cases have also been covered by the media. The 2014 case of the withdrawal of articles on STAP cells followed a rare course in which research misconduct became a full-blown social phenomenon. In recent years, even the University of Tokyo has experienced reported cases of research misconduct. In this report, I would like to introduce some representative cases of research misconduct in the field of life sciences over the past decade. These examples include studies conducted at Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine (2006), Osaka University Graduate School of Frontier Bioscience (2006), Ryukyu University School of Medicine (2010), Toho University School of Medicine (2012), The University of Tokyo Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biosciences (2013), and several cases outside of Japan. I will discuss what researchers should do to reduce the incidence of research misconduct. In addition, I will discuss how these cases were covered by the media, because the public's impression of research misconduct is formed by media coverage.
引用
收藏
页码:459 / 464
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The PubPeer conundrum: Administrative challenges in research misconduct proceedings
    Caron, Minal M.
    Lye, Carolyn T.
    Bierer, Barbara E.
    Barnes, Mark
    ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-ETHICS INTEGRITY AND POLICY, 2024,
  • [42] How to Act When Research Misconduct Is Not Detected by Software but Revealed by the Author of the Plagiarized Article
    Baydik, Olga D.
    Gasparyan, Armen Yuri
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2016, 31 (10) : 1508 - 1510
  • [43] The landscape of urological retractions: the prevalence of reported research misconduct
    Mena, Jorge D.
    Ndoye, Medina
    Cohen, Andrew J.
    Kamal, Puneet
    Breyer, Benjamin N.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 124 (01) : 174 - 179
  • [44] Image Manipulation as Research Misconduct
    Parrish, Debra
    Noonan, Bridget
    SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS, 2009, 15 (02) : 161 - 167
  • [45] Image Manipulation as Research Misconduct
    Debra Parrish
    Bridget Noonan
    Science and Engineering Ethics, 2009, 15 : 161 - 167
  • [46] Integrity and misconduct in biomedical research
    Schonhaut B, Luisa
    REVISTA CHILENA DE PEDIATRIA-CHILE, 2019, 90 (02): : 217 - 221
  • [47] From research misconduct to disciplinary sanction: an empirical examination of French higher education case law
    Leclerc, Olivier
    Klausser, Nicolas
    RESEARCH ETHICS, 2025, 21 (01) : 34 - 55
  • [48] Research fundamentals VI: Misconduct in biomedical research
    Biros, MH
    Fish, SS
    Taggart, P
    ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1999, 6 (08) : 840 - 848
  • [49] National Scientific Misconduct Policies in Argentina: Two Definitions of Research Misconduct
    Dana Bianchini, Alahi
    Mastroleo, Ignacio
    ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-POLICIES AND QUALITY ASSURANCE, 2018, 25 (7-8): : 419 - 422
  • [50] Seven ways to plagiarize: Handling real allegations of research misconduct
    Loui, MC
    SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS, 2002, 8 (04) : 529 - 539