Research Misconduct in Japan and How It Is Covered by the Media

被引:1
作者
Enoki, Eisuke [1 ]
机构
[1] Kinki Univ Hosp, Clin Res Ctr, 377-2 Ohno Higashi, Osaka, Osaka 5898511, Japan
来源
YAKUGAKU ZASSHI-JOURNAL OF THE PHARMACEUTICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN | 2018年 / 138卷 / 04期
关键词
research integrity; research misconduct; fabrication; falsification; plagiarism;
D O I
10.1248/yakushi.17-00181-1
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Cases of research misconduct (fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism) have been increasing worldwide, including in Japan. In particular, since 2006, many cases of research misconduct have been reported in Japan, and these cases have also been covered by the media. The 2014 case of the withdrawal of articles on STAP cells followed a rare course in which research misconduct became a full-blown social phenomenon. In recent years, even the University of Tokyo has experienced reported cases of research misconduct. In this report, I would like to introduce some representative cases of research misconduct in the field of life sciences over the past decade. These examples include studies conducted at Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine (2006), Osaka University Graduate School of Frontier Bioscience (2006), Ryukyu University School of Medicine (2010), Toho University School of Medicine (2012), The University of Tokyo Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biosciences (2013), and several cases outside of Japan. I will discuss what researchers should do to reduce the incidence of research misconduct. In addition, I will discuss how these cases were covered by the media, because the public's impression of research misconduct is formed by media coverage.
引用
收藏
页码:459 / 464
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Explanations of Research Misconduct, and How They Hang Together
    Haven, Tamarinde
    van Woudenberg, Rene
    JOURNAL FOR GENERAL PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 2021, 52 (04) : 543 - 561
  • [2] Explanations of Research Misconduct, and How They Hang Together
    Tamarinde Haven
    René van Woudenberg
    Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 2021, 52 : 543 - 561
  • [3] Is it time to revise the definition of research misconduct?
    Resnik, David B.
    ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-POLICIES AND QUALITY ASSURANCE, 2019, 26 (02): : 123 - 137
  • [4] A review of the types of scientific misconduct in biomedical research
    Kumar M.N.
    Journal of Academic Ethics, 2008, 6 (3) : 211 - 228
  • [5] Research Misconduct: A Report from a Developing Country
    Khadem-Rezaiyan, Majid
    Dadgarmoghaddam, Maliheh
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2017, 46 (10) : 1374 - 1378
  • [6] Evaluating US Medical Schools' Efforts to Educate Faculty Researchers on Research Integrity and Research Misconduct Policies and Procedures
    Titus, Sandra Larsen
    ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-POLICIES AND QUALITY ASSURANCE, 2014, 21 (01): : 9 - +
  • [7] Research Misconduct in the Croatian Scientific Community: A Survey Assessing the Forms and Characteristics of Research Misconduct
    Pupovac, Vanja
    Prijic-Samarzija, Snjezana
    Petrovecki, Mladen
    SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS, 2017, 23 (01) : 165 - 181
  • [8] Research misconduct
    Gilbert, FJ
    Denison, AR
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2003, 58 (07) : 499 - 504
  • [9] How prevalent is academic misconduct in management research?
    Hopp, Christian
    Hoover, Gary A.
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2017, 80 : 73 - 81
  • [10] Procedures and Principles of Disposal of Research Misconduct in Japan From the Perspective of Case Analysis
    Yuan, Cao
    Yong, Zhao
    SAGE OPEN, 2021, 11 (04):