Treatment of latent infection to achieve tuberculosis elimination in low-incidence countries

被引:29
作者
Campbell, Jonathon R. [1 ,2 ]
Dowdy, David [3 ]
Schwartzman, Kevin [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, McGill Int TB Ctr, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, Resp Epidemiol & Clin Res Unit, Montreal Chest Inst, Ctr Hlth, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
COST-EFFECTIVENESS; UNITED-STATES; HEALTH; CARE;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pmed.1002824
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Tuberculosis (TB) persists in the United States, Canada, and other high-income, low-incidence countries largely because of ongoing reactivation of latent TB infection (LTBI). • TB elimination in low-incidence countries, defined as an annual incidence of ≤1 case per million, will require extensive screening and treatment of LTBI, including in people for whom the harms of LTBI treatment outweigh the likely benefits: for example, older foreign-born individuals with no recent travel/exposure. Ongoing migration from higher-incidence countries, as well as pockets of transmission in vulnerable subgroups such as prisoners, homeless persons, and drug users, will also continue to pose challenges for TB elimination. • Policymakers in low-incidence countries face a choice between a utilitarian approach that tolerates individual net harm to advance public health goals and a patient-centered approach that values shared decision-making but will predictably result in failure to achieve TB elimination. • While TB elimination is an important aspirational vision, the ethical implications of this goal—namely the implicit requirement to offer LTBI screening and treatment to individuals who are more likely to experience harm than good—merit careful reflection. © 2019 Campbell et al.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   The cascade of care in diagnosis and treatment of latent tuberculosis infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Alsdurf, Hannah ;
Hill, Philip C. ;
Matteelli, Alberto ;
Getahun, Haileyesus ;
Menzies, Dick .
LANCET INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2016, 16 (11) :1269-1278
[2]  
American Thoracic Society and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2000, AM J RESP CRIT CARE, V162, P2033, DOI [10.1164/ajrccm.162.6.2004022 11112109, DOI 10.1164/AJRCCM.162.6.2004022]
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, TUB GUID GUID
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2014, TB EL ACT FRAM LOW I
[5]  
California Department of Public Health, 2018, TB RISK ASS
[6]   A Systematic Review of Studies Evaluating the Cost Utility of Screening High-Risk Populations for Latent Tuberculosis Infection [J].
Campbell, Jonathon R. ;
Sasitharan, Thenuga ;
Marra, Fawziah .
APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY, 2015, 13 (04) :325-340
[7]  
CDC, 2018, Measles
[8]  
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2018, REP TUB US 2017
[9]   Latent tuberculous infection: ethical considerations in formulating public health policy [J].
Denholm, J. T. ;
Matteelli, A. ;
Reis, A. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TUBERCULOSIS AND LUNG DISEASE, 2015, 19 (02) :137-140
[10]   Measles vaccines - A review of adverse events [J].
Duclos, P ;
Ward, BJ .
DRUG SAFETY, 1998, 19 (06) :435-454