Risks and Assets: A Qualitative Study of a Software Ecosystem in the Mining Industry

被引:5
作者
Olsson, Thomas [1 ]
Franke, Ulrik [2 ]
机构
[1] RISE Res Inst Sweden AB, Lund, Sweden
[2] RISE Res Inst Sweden AB, Kista, Sweden
来源
ESEC/FSE'2019: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2019 27TH ACM JOINT MEETING ON EUROPEAN SOFTWARE ENGINEERING CONFERENCE AND SYMPOSIUM ON THE FOUNDATIONS OF SOFTWARE ENGINEERING | 2019年
关键词
Risk Management; Service Level Agreement; Software ecosystem; Survey; Case study;
D O I
10.1145/3338906.3340443
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Digitalization and servitization are impacting many domains, including the mining industry. As the equipment becomes connected and technical infrastructure evolves, business models and risk management need to adapt. In this paper, we present a study on how changes in asset and risk distribution are evolving for the actors in a software ecosystem (SECO) and system-of-systems (SoS) around a mining operation. We have performed a survey to understand how Service Level Agreements (SLAs) - a common mechanism for managing risk - are used in other domains. Furthermore, we have performed a focus group study with companies. There is an overall trend in the mining industry to move the investment cost (CAPEX) from the mining operator to the vendors. Hence, the mining operator instead leases the equipment (as operational expense, OPEX) or even acquires a service. This change in business model impacts operation, as knowledge is moved from the mining operator to the suppliers. Furthermore, as the infrastructure becomes more complex, this implies that the mining operator is more and more reliant on the suppliers for the operation and maintenance. As this change is still in an early stage, there is no formalized risk management, e.g. through SLAs, in place. Rather, at present, the companies in the ecosystem rely more on trust and the incentives created by the promise of mutual future benefits of innovation activities. We believe there is a need to better understand how to manage risk in SECO as it is established and evolves. At the same time, in a SECO, the focus is on cooperation and innovation, the companies do not have incentives to address this unless there is an incident. Therefore, industry need, we believe, help in systematically understanding risk and defining quality aspects such as reliability and performance in the new business environment.
引用
收藏
页码:895 / 904
页数:10
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   On leveraging policy-based management for maximizing business profit [J].
Aib, Issam ;
Boutaba, Raouf .
IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, 2007, 4 (03) :25-39
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, P 11 INT C WIRTSCH L
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2011, REAL WORLD RES
[4]   Characteristics of software ecosystems for Federated Embedded Systems: A case study [J].
Axelsson, Jakob ;
Papatheocharous, Efi ;
Andersson, Jesper .
INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 56 (11) :1457-1475
[5]   Piggybacking on an Autonomous Hauler: Business Models Enabling a System-of-Systems Approach to Mapping an Underground Mine [J].
Borg, Markus ;
Olsson, Thomas ;
Svensson, John .
2017 IEEE 25TH INTERNATIONAL REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING CONFERENCE (RE), 2017, :372-381
[6]  
Casalicchio E., 2013, Proc. of the 2013 ACM Cloud Autonomic Computing Conf, P1
[7]  
Chesbrough H., 2006, OI: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology
[8]   The Nature of the Firm [J].
Coase, R. H. .
ECONOMICA-NEW SERIES, 1937, 4 (16) :386-405
[9]   A Systematic Review of Service Level Management in the Cloud [J].
Faniyi, Funmilade ;
Bahsoon, Rami .
ACM COMPUTING SURVEYS, 2015, 48 (03)
[10]   Five misunderstandings about case-study research [J].
Flyvbjerg, B .
QUALITATIVE INQUIRY, 2006, 12 (02) :219-245