Methane Production Dynamics of Co-Digestion of Cow Manure and Food Waste Under Mesophilic Condition

被引:5
作者
Bi, Shaojie [1 ,2 ]
Hong, Xiujie [3 ]
Bai, Yan [1 ]
Liu, Jinli [1 ]
Yu, Xinhui [1 ]
Fang, Shumei [1 ]
Gao, Yamei [1 ]
Yan, Lei [1 ]
Wang, Zhihui [1 ]
Wang, Yanjie [1 ]
Wang, Weidong [1 ]
机构
[1] Heilongjiang Bayi Agr Univ, Heilongjiang Prov Key Lab Environm Microbiol & Re, Coll Life Sci & Technol, Daqing 163319, Peoples R China
[2] China Agr Univ, Coll Engn, Biomass Engn Ctr, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[3] Minist Agr, Commiss Agr Daqing City, Daqing 163311, Heilongjiang, Peoples R China
关键词
Cattle Manure; Food Waste; Methane Fermentation; Methane Production Dynamics; ANAEROBIC-DIGESTION; AMMONIA INHIBITION; CATTLE MANURE; DAIRY MANURE; METHANOGENESIS; HYDROLYSIS;
D O I
10.1166/jbmb.2019.1846
中图分类号
O69 [应用化学];
学科分类号
081704 ;
摘要
A batch experiment of 30 days was carried out under mesophilic (37 +/- 1 degrees C) condition using cattle manure (CM), food waste (FW) and the mixture of cattle manure and food waste with ratios of 3:1(T1), 2:1(T2), 1:1(T3), 1:2 (T4) and 1:3(T5) based on volatile solids to test the biogas production dynamics and potential when the seed sludge was obtained from the effluent of cattle manure and food waste anaerobic co-digestion reactor. An obvious two-stage characteristic with CM, FW and the mixture methane production was simulated by Gompertz model and first order kinetics model was analyzed. The values of the first methane production stage kinetics K-1 of CM, FW, T1, T2, T3, T4 and T5 were 0.0564, 0.1132, 0.0629, 0.0668, 0.0726, 0.087 and 0.0853 d(-1). Then the values of the second methane production stage appeared at day 12, 12, 12, 10, 8 and 8, respectively, along with much higher constants K-2 of 0.1346, 0.1478, 0.1948, 0.2153, 0.2299 and 0.2068. Thus, comparing the values of the two methane production stages, the second stage had a higher methane production rate. According to the kinetics of methane production using Gompertz model, the anaerobic digestion of CM, FW, T1, T2, T3, T4 and T5 got the maximum methane production rate (R-max) of 5.7, 48.1, 10.4, 13.2, 16.2, 22.9 and 28.2 mL CH4 center dot gVS(-1).d(-1) at day 9.6, 4.6, 8.4, 8.4, 7.9, 7.9 and 5.8, then at day 23.8, 11.5, 22.1, 21.2, 20.3, 17.6 and 16.2, 90% of total methane was produced. The batch tests illustrated that adding FW in CM can increase the methane production in comparison with the mono-fermentation of CM, while the best methane production was found in FW mono-fermentation.
引用
收藏
页码:257 / 263
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and dairy manure: Effects of food waste particle size and organic loading rate [J].
Agyeman, Fred O. ;
Tao, Wendong .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2014, 133 :268-274
[2]  
APHA (American Public Health Association), 1995, STANDARD METHODS EXA
[3]   Solid state anaerobic co-digestion of yard waste and food waste for biogas production [J].
Brown, Dan ;
Li, Yebo .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 127 :275-280
[4]   MECHANISM OF METHANE FERMENTATION [J].
BUSWELL, AM ;
MUELLER, HF .
INDUSTRIAL AND ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY, 1952, 44 (03) :550-552
[5]  
Camilla M., 2017, BIORESOURCE TECHNOL, V248, P37
[6]   Cleaner energy for cleaner production: Modeling and optimization of biogas generation from Carica papayas (Pawpaw) fruit peels [J].
Dahunsi, Samuel Olatunde ;
Oranusi, Solomon ;
Efeovbokhan, Vincent Enontiemonria .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 156 :19-29
[7]   Characterizing the variability of food waste quality: A need for efficient valorisation through anaerobic digestion [J].
Fisgativa, Henry ;
Tremier, Anne ;
Dabert, Patrick .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2016, 50 :264-274
[8]   Biogas potential and microbial population distributions in flushed dairy manure and implications on anaerobic digestion technology [J].
Frear, Craig ;
Wang, Zhi-Wu ;
Li, Chenlin ;
Chen, Shulin .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2011, 86 (01) :145-152
[9]   AMMONIA INHIBITION OF METHANOGENESIS FROM CATTLE WASTES [J].
HASHIMOTO, AG .
AGRICULTURAL WASTES, 1986, 17 (04) :241-261
[10]   Anaerobic co-digestion of cattle manure and alternative crops for the substitution of maize in South Europe [J].
Kalamaras, S. D. ;
Kotsopoulos, T. A. .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 172 :68-75